People are protesting genocide but LOOK AT WHOSE STANDING NEXT TO EACH OTHER! AWKWAAAAARDD!!
I didn't reward the bait so I don't know if I'm way off base. But I'm assuming it's not just Bernie and Greene and there's literally no reason to tie them together except for "heehoo tiny incongruence make brain feel funny." I mean, it's genocide. You don't need to go "wow if these two are against you it must be bad" as if that actually means anything.
They're skateboards and halfpipes. Newsom ramps off Trump for some sick air and we go nuts. Then Trump ramps off Newsom and does a 900 causing the crowd to burst into applause. At the end the respective judges for both sides holds up their scorecards.
They look like they enjoy the sport and the cheers from the crowd. I expect them to shake hands and say "good game" afterwards. I'm not interested in their sport I just want to see them break their legs.
Battlefield players don't play battlefield though. CoD kids do.
They added class customization and crazy weapon unlocks. Optimized for "battlefield moments" instead of "using your brain." They need the game to be adhd friendly which left no place for the Commander system. Reloading was changed to be magic per-bullet bullshit instead of based on magazines. They've cultivated a culture of "look at those buildings collapse, man I hope the next battlefield is like a Michael Bay movie, oh man it's like battlefield 1 we're so back"
If new battlefield games are fun for you then you are more like CoD kids than people who installed realism mods for 1942.
I thought they were making fun of the idea of sending peacekeepers to break up a rabid animal attacking something. Like what's next: negotiating with wild fires? Russia is going to take stabs at their neighbors, you need to send in bullies that will slap them down and keep them in check.
I didn't think to imagine someone backing up Russia. You know, considering it's Russia.
It's just absurd to consider that a volunteer would accept military life, military camps, hostile foreign countries, getting shot at by old men fighting for arbitrary ideals in a far away land... and they (pretend to?) agonize over morals...
This is just national guards but still. There's a lot of people that are willing to kill people to protect our freedoms.
But there's a conspicuous lack of soldiers fighting and dying for our freedoms when it's clear as day. Whoops! There goes basically their only justification.
It would be interesting if they knew how to use LLMs. If I wanted output based on a middle class old white woman I would put effort into capturing that person in tone and style. Not just prompt with "respond like a old white woman please" It's like they don't yet grasp how to structure the landscape around their target output for the LLM to latch onto.
They should also consider that there's a difference between a human saying something for another human to hear, and a human having a belief. There's a fundamental gap between "what does this white woman think?" and a white woman telling a survey in public that she approves/disapproves of Trump. Should have went down the path of asking "what does a old white woman want others to think she thinks?"
Asking an LLM to respond in such a way, using such sterile tone... it just completely fails to capture the nuance I (naively) expected them to account for.
I got too far in the article to not hear about people possibly mass reporting the pic. I don't want to hear people on social media and how they think it's censorship, zuck sucking trump, whatever.
Oh fuck, I read the entire thing and it never even mentions it. Maybe I need to finish my coffee but it seems like kids just don't realize you can abuse automated systems, or if you can, that it's not automatically a deliberate attempt to censor their ideas. It's too hard to imagine with "but it's meta! Zuck bent the knee!" screaming in your mind's ear.
All of his money is tainted and when it touches other money that money is then tainted. We should take away all that tainted money no matter who has it at the end. His grandchildren should know what it means to work or be destitute.
The number of people killed is actually the number of verified dead bodies; it doesn't include people blown to pieces or buried under debris. I feel like that meaningful difference should always be presented instead of casually simplifying it to "number of people killed."
They're both a lot to unpack. Fucking an autocomplete? Thinking it loves you? That reminds me of people forming relationships with dolls.
Fucking a hyper realistic psuedohuman with the implication it can't say no / will be deleted when the user gets bored? If LLMs are affecting people while being what they are... I bet exploring fantasies with "real AI" would be turbometh for some people.
Yes. I would care. I'm a piece of shit conservative who lives and dies by optics. I'm trying to be president. The moment I'm seen as just a silly little couch fucker I will be ripped apart by the mob.
That's why me and my fellow conservatives are so obviously unaffected. We think about how others will perceive us. We think about it and then we do a little dance so others know we're above it all.
Even if I don't care I can't afford to let people think I do. Trump may be a successful child rapist but this is still a country full of people who will drop you for... seeming excited, or looking silly in a tank, or denying you are a crook.
(I imagined I was Vance. Normal people wouldn't care. A maga vice president is not like your coworkers and neighbors though.)
I can't run local models bigger than 7b q_4_k_m or so, so I'm safe for now. The idea of revealing my deeper personality to corporate LLMs is horrifying.
I don't think these people are telling us what they think and feel about people who get caught up in LLMs. I think he's just telling us that he's cooler than them.
I thought Newsom was a Republican. Like a sheet made from the same cloth, but draped over a more progressive shape. He calls himself whatever and pays respects to the left but it's the same kind of creature inhabiting the position.
How can you guys tell that conservatives think Americans will care about Clinton? Doesn't that assume logic? An understanding of how we think?
I'm pretty sure they're just repeating what they've heard.
We call them racist, so they shout "that's racist!" at us.
We call their actions unconstitutional, so they say leftist policies are unconstitutional.
They don't care about science or evidence or even internal consistency. Yet we gotta pretend like they're... substantial. As if anything they say is serious.
Feels like this is celebrity tabloid shit.
People are protesting genocide but LOOK AT WHOSE STANDING NEXT TO EACH OTHER! AWKWAAAAARDD!!
I didn't reward the bait so I don't know if I'm way off base. But I'm assuming it's not just Bernie and Greene and there's literally no reason to tie them together except for "heehoo tiny incongruence make brain feel funny." I mean, it's genocide. You don't need to go "wow if these two are against you it must be bad" as if that actually means anything.