I genuinely don't understand why people here are railing him. All the article said was he wanted to research environmental causes for an increasingly common condition. That seems totally reasonable. Look at car pollution reducing avg brain capacity. Look at plastics pollution. Look at toxins in ultraproceassed food, many of which are banned in EU but not USA. Look at our water quality and lead pipes problem
Look, I know he has talked about vaccines before, but literally didn't mention it here. It's totally reasonable and good for all of us to tackle pollutants, toxins, environmental quality. Yes, it's likely that many health problems would be resolved if we understood this better; that's a valid theory to pursue. But yes, I know, I know "maga bad"
I genuinely have no idea how to defend tech from big money. The reality is that the startup industry as a whole has been purchased by the vc machine, and success in any venture is highly coupled with your business network connections. They can afford to outpace you: it's play ball or fall behind. There is very much a "silicon valley royalty" oligarchy that cooperates and prevents real threats to their power
The world of tech VC is structured into a heirarchy where smaller VCs make money by selling their risky ventures to more powerful VCs after the company proves itself. It's a pyramid
The case studies are infinite here, but just look at something disruptive like Bitcoin was. The play? Blockstream was given 75m by the banksters to buy up the developers and communication forums. Eventually they were able to obtain the commit rights to the Bitcoin repo, and control the narrative on Reddit. At that point, the revolution was over, and the controlled manipulation to make money began -- a new unregulated space where they could move the price however they wanted
I don't really believe in the fediverse. Why? Because of the business power law: the top entity in any space controls more than the rest combined. Stuff like email providers consolidated. We already see lemmy.world as pretty much "the" instance. Imagine they sell out, which is a very hard temptation to refuse at a certain scale. Or big tech makes the hot new instance and out funds it
Yeah there were similar battles in music copyright about whether a style of music as a whole can be copyrighted. Overall, the answer is "hell no" but with a couple outlier cases. This steps a lot on stuff like parody, which is protected by the first amendment as "fair use". But it gets messy when things are "too similar" -- a grey area exists
To this day homies don't understand the simple rule that controversy sells. It powers the brand. It keeps it in the news every day. Manage a steady drip of "bad but not soooo bad" controversy and you win. Case in point: Trump
If you want something to end, get people to stop thinking about it. I suspect people just like having something to be mad about and "belong" to an ingroup of other people mad at it too
Inb4 people are mad at me for "supporting Elon" by saying the above, right? Because obviously what he's doing is so bad and evil that "how dare I" not stand up against it? Well, I hope you enjoy the ride
It seems like there's more to it since you generally also have to pay the union dues, is that factored into the math here?
Unions are tricky. Police union that keeps cops from being punished? Idk maybe not great. Union that pays dock workers that don't actually work to keep automation from ruining the job landscape? I'm not sure. Teachers negotiating for fair pay? Seems great!!
Like all things in society, we need nuance, not "unions good" or "unions bad"
I think for those that wanted Teslas, they realized they have to buy them before the tariff war gets too hot. So ironically there's a surge of purchases
Ideology aside, they make some very good cars, and I don't blame people for buying them
VPNs don't help here, the website asks you for your driver's license. Tbf giving your credit card to them is typically enough for them (big tech + govt) to construct a full profile of who you are anyway, and that was the original "age gate" -- though there are some services that make CCs modestly privacy preserving -- not the case for IDs
Everything is customizable if you are brave enough with the code :)
But yeah gnome is known for breaking changes & rewrites. As a result, Cosmic desktop was born to be more stable and reliable with plugins. That's ~alpha. But if you truly wanna DIY, then the tiling window managers are king. Stuff like dwm and awesomewm where you configure every part of the UI and can easily make your own widgets
Nice read, thanks. Flutter seems like a more obvious choice for apps: can run on web, understands mobile UX, has all the plugins ... but I like the path godot is on
Lung @ lung @lemmy.world Posts 7Comments 384Joined 2 yr. ago
I genuinely don't understand why people here are railing him. All the article said was he wanted to research environmental causes for an increasingly common condition. That seems totally reasonable. Look at car pollution reducing avg brain capacity. Look at plastics pollution. Look at toxins in ultraproceassed food, many of which are banned in EU but not USA. Look at our water quality and lead pipes problem
Look, I know he has talked about vaccines before, but literally didn't mention it here. It's totally reasonable and good for all of us to tackle pollutants, toxins, environmental quality. Yes, it's likely that many health problems would be resolved if we understood this better; that's a valid theory to pursue. But yes, I know, I know "maga bad"