Consider that when you read, there are 2 sources of information, the arrangement of the words and the meaning of the words. The arrangement comes from the screen the meaning comes from you. Which is the bigger hunk of information?
Tags like "original source" and "number of iterations from original source"
("Iterations" probably isn't the right term. If Bob saw it, then Bob told Sally, then Sally told Frank. Frank has "3rd iteration" knowledge. But what's the better term?)
I mean if I tell you about the taste of a peanut butter sandwich, how do you tell whether I actually ate a peanut butter sandwich? Or I just read about a peanut butter sandwich??
That's a damn good point. It could be chat bots talking to chat bots all the way down and we'd never know the difference.
This is a quality of the kind of knowledge we deal in here. Compared to first-hand experience, it is a lesser quality of knowledge. A trashy knowledge if you will.
Meanwhile in the real world other CEOs create investment products, home furnishings and consumer entertainments. While Musk creates spaceships. Yes, those other guys look damn petty in comparison. And by petty I mean small. Do I need to underline my point again?
The center of the bell curve. The most popular of popular media. The true fast food. Probably not.
Because being rich frees you from many of the stresses and concerns that define the populace. Your tastes are different then.
The edger case? Sure. Good art is good art, no matter how rich you are.