Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IA
Posts
26
Comments
292
Joined
11 mo. ago

  • The center of the bell curve. The most popular of popular media. The true fast food. Probably not.

    Because being rich frees you from many of the stresses and concerns that define the populace. Your tastes are different then.

    The edger case? Sure. Good art is good art, no matter how rich you are.

  • Most of the information isn't filtered that way, for various reasons. Maybe we could but we generally don't.

    We could make information that's easier to filter. For example, tags telling us how many steps-removed from the original source.

  • Yeah, solipsism.

    Consider that when you read, there are 2 sources of information, the arrangement of the words and the meaning of the words. The arrangement comes from the screen the meaning comes from you. Which is the bigger hunk of information?

  • That much is obvious.

    I'd say that the important things are

    1. That we swallow knowledge gained this way pretty much automatically. Like the default is to believe it or react to it, with very little filtering.
    2. That it lacks indicators that might help us filter it. First-hand knowledge and tenth-hand knowledge look exactly the same.
  • I'm talking about any statement about reality. All by itself. With no knowledge about the person who said it.

    I think that the guy who saw it and the guy who heard it tenth-hand get equal weight, because we have no way of telling the difference.

    So maybe we should have a way to tell the difference.

  • I imagine language with some new tags.

    Tags like "original source" and "number of iterations from original source"

    ("Iterations" probably isn't the right term. If Bob saw it, then Bob told Sally, then Sally told Frank. Frank has "3rd iteration" knowledge. But what's the better term?)

  • That's a damn good point. It could be chat bots talking to chat bots all the way down and we'd never know the difference.

    This is a quality of the kind of knowledge we deal in here. Compared to first-hand experience, it is a lesser quality of knowledge. A trashy knowledge if you will.

  • But it's just talk. Just. Talk.

    Meanwhile in the real world other CEOs create investment products, home furnishings and consumer entertainments. While Musk creates spaceships. Yes, those other guys look damn petty in comparison. And by petty I mean small. Do I need to underline my point again?