ASeriesOfPoorChoices @ ASeriesOfPoorChoices @lemmy.world

When faced with a series of unfortunate events, I make a series of poor cho

---

Read more

Posts

1

Comments

1,771

Joined

2 yr. ago

Just as long as we're all aware that while those are all reasons put forward, they are all false / lies / misleading.

Magic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Australian_Indigenous_Voice_referendum#Proposed_design_of_the_Voice

Except it is often the case they are pieces of shit.

Sane people don't vote for Clive or Pauline, for example.

that a large portion (possibly not the majority)

Not the majority. Not close. Less than 20%.

The exact details of the legislation were released on the 23 of March. As in, 6-7 months ago.

No, liberals are liberal. The Liberals (capital L) are fiscally liberal (good at wasting money) and socially conservative.

No. Asking questions is one thing.

Sealioning is another.

I mean, yeah - didn't you read the proposed legislation released back in March?

You mean, like how the original commenter did?

Authoritarian capitalism isn't much better, but fortunately, I included the word authoritarian.

Huh? Improve your literacy, and reread the word I wrote in front of communist.

The referendum was about permanently

Lie. Not permanent, just more resistant to change.

enshrining

Lie. Not religious.

an advisory body into Australian politics specifically to make race-based representations to parliament.

Lie. Specifically to make CULTURE based respresentations.

That is racist. Most Australians don't support embedding racism into our Constitution.

While "true", not relevant, since nothing racist was being embedded. But it IS racist to try and make up a lie to mislead and oppress.

They voted against it. The end.

Lie. It won't be "the end" until you racists finish massacring them all.

That needs to be copied, laminated and posted outside with pride.

Some are educated, some are racist - no reason they can't be both.

It's easy to understand ignorance and racism.

(There's a third option, and that's for the mining magnates like Clive who want less complaining about digging up sacred sites)

"Google it" vs "no". The point of the slogan was to highlight a) how the other side was shutting down the conversation and b) that their premise of ignorance was stupid, in a short pithy way.

It wasn't saying "go find out", so much as "you CAN find out if you care, there is no reason to not know"

That said, without question, the Yes campaign's official messages were pretty poor. Supporters have been far more eloquent.

On the "just google it" topic, this short video was brilliantly well done: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SAqIypjk-5A

So... you agree then? That Tasmania has done more / come closer to achieving that horrific goal than other states?

I didn't say "exterminated entirely". I said "taking point". As in leading the nation (state-wise).

I can understand the misunderstanding from an implication - but remembering the Black War is a good way to help fight against it happening again.

Lol.

Look at the authoritarian communist, dictating how other people must live their lives.

Let's round up all the artists and musicians too, because they're not feeding kids or something.

It's in an autosequence.

The people who designed this were paid to design this. I presume that at least some of them have children. Therefore, resources spent to invent this did go to give children food, water, shelter, etc.

You're welcome.

"enshrine" 🙄

Spoken like a racist.