AggressivelyPassive @ agressivelyPassive @feddit.de

Posts

28

Comments

2,513

Joined

2 yr. ago

You know exactly that this is not what I wrote or implied.

So why do you think this crap brings anything to the table? Do you need this to feel alive?

Keep in mind, though, that farmers pretty much always complain. If harvest is bad, they want more subsidies or guaranteed prices, if harvest is good, they almost die because of all the regulations that keep them from earning even more.

Ich find's immer lustig, dass die Wertbürger selbst ein Thema aufs Tableau bringen, dass eigentlich niemanden wirklich juckt, sich über Jahre darüber aufregen und dann rumheulen, dass sich alle nur noch um dieses Thema dreht.

Keine Sau (Eber sind mitgemeint) interessiert Gendern, das macht man halt oder auch nicht und gut ist. Aber nein, Rechtsaußen muss daraus einen Kulturkampf machen, bei dem im Namen der Redefreiheit die Sprache eingeschränkt. Absolute Clowns.

Even doubling the salary is far less than what you'd pay in the US, and as a rule of thumb, German labour, including all the indirect costs, is about twice the gross salary.

Compared to Valley workers, Germans are still cheap. 100k is a very very good salary over here.

In the sense, medicine is applied physics, just as everything else.

Thing is, you always break down a problem into just enough details to solve the problem. Not more. No physicist studying, say, airflow over the Atlantic will take quantum effects or relativistic effects into account. Magnetic fields are also ignored. Even clouds are surprisingly "low res" in most simulations.

So you're telling me, they kill beings because they are bad at proper due diligence while soil scouting?

Maybe having halfspheres at the top and bottom? So more like a gas tank, less like a piece of sausage.

Now, how exactly is a penguin toroidal?

That's pretty much the same in most fields, especially in the engineering direction. Idealized gases are idealized, steel beams are assumed to have a certain stiffness just by convention, and your entire existence is represented by a bunch of form fields stored in a database somewhere.

Yep. All models are wrong, some are useful.

That's actually what it's called in German. Never thought about the implications of the "X evolved to Y" screens.

It's not unheard of, that Western companies sell products they can't legally sell in the West to poorer countries and/or the farmers get no or too little information about the health effects. Don't forget that many of them are just small time farmers without that much formal education. If they get told, the pesticide is fine, they might believe it.

Is your company as prestigious as Tesla (was)?

They sell a dream to young people. Some bite, some don't. But those who do, will become loyal servants.

It's the same strategy cults use.

And what is the result? Either you have to check the sources if they really mean what the agent says they do, or you don't check them meaning the whole thing is useless since they might come up with garbage anyway.

I think you're arguing on a different level than I am. I'm not interested in mitigations or workarounds. That's fine for a specific use case, but I'm talking about the usage in principle. You inherently cannot trust an AI. It does hallucinate. And unless we get the "shroominess" down to an extremely low level, we can't trust the system with anything important. It will always be just a small tool that needs professional supervision.

See, again, nitpicky details, even though we both know exactly what was meant.

Don't forget that most of these guys are petite bourgeoisie at best, mostly even lower.

They think 10k is a lot and they feel powerful and important because they are invited by russian state media. These are small men from small backgrounds, desperately trying to feel big. Unfortunately, they hit the right sentiment to resonate with a bunch of small people with delusions of national grandeur.

Ich würde 5€ zahlen, um nie wieder nach Duisburg zu müssen.

Oh, I'm terribly sorry that I didn't use the exact wording that the semantic overlord required for his incantations.

Let's recap, you only read the title, which by definition does not contain all the information, you wrote an extremely arrogant and absolutely not helpful comment, if challenged you answer with even more arrogance, and your only defense is nitpicky semantics, which even if taken at face value, do not change the value of your comment at all.

You are not helping anyone. No, not even others.

Even agents suffer from the same problem stated above: you can't trust them.

Compare it to a traditional SQL database. If the DB says, that it saved a row or that there are 40 rows in the table, then that's true. They do have bugs, obviously, but in general you can trust them.

AI agents don't have that level of reliability. They'll happily tell you that the empty database has all the 509 entries you expect them to have. Sure, you can improve reliability, but you won't get anywhere near the DB example.

And I think that's what makes it so hard to extrapolate progress. AI fails miserably at absolute basic tasks and doesn't even see that it failed. Success seems more chance than science. That's the opposite of how every technology before worked. Simple problems first, if that's solved, you push towards the next challenge. AI in contrast is remarkably good at some highly complex tasks, but then fails at basic reasoning a minute later.