Could it be used on someone who is a 7 year old to rid them of this?
No. Gene editing works in this case since they're just working with a few cells. But a whole human is way more cells. Not only that, but the cells have already developed into structures that are much harder to access, and difficult to change. Any gene therapy may only affect a few cells.
On top of that, there's also a bunch of ethical issues around altering a human when they've already formed, and we don't really know if it would be possible to do so, or if it would make things worse.
Isn't showing how to use the camera just a common courtesy if you're asking them to take a photo for you? It's not really specific to a disposable camera, nor today. Even back in the day, people would do the same, despite cameras generally having a big clear button to take the photo with.
That implies that Britain didn't intend those consequences. But Britain has mastered using starvation as a weapon of genocide, in particular by masking it as an "unfortunate" result of taxes and tariffs.
We do know that the British did try and get the Irish to renounce their heritage to receive aid during the famine as well. Some families had to renounce their Irish name and Catholicism before they would be given food during the famine.
ChatGPT itself is also many text-generation models in a coat, since they will automatically switch between models depending on what options you choose, and whether you've passed your quota.
Roomba, the robot vacuum cleaner company, had to institute a policy where they would preserve the original machine as much as possible, because people were getting attached to their robot vacuum cleaner, and didn't want it replaced outright, even when it was more economical to do so.
Not for Trump, but for Musk. He achieved his goals, so is trying to salvage his reputation before Tesla's board kicks him for ruining the company's profits.
You can get them fresh from the factory. Sure, they need 96 batteries each, but beats all that nasty wood and bugs.