T156 @ T156 @lemmy.world

Posts

14

Comments

1,470

Joined

2 yr. ago

Once it generates the response, there is a button you can click to make it use the reasoning model.

Why they did it that way instead of giving users the option to just set the model that they want to use ahead of time boggles the mind. Surely it would be more efficient for them to chose a model if they want ahead of time, rather than generating something that's going to be regenerated with the desired model instead.

Can't have issues on the issue tracker if you're not allowing people to submit issues.

It seems like the kind of thing that would give rise to the ~ Earth movement

Generative AI too. It might be hammered into everything to the point of being tiresome, but it is technologically impressive that you can have a computer just synthesise a photo/video/music.

Compare to 20 years ago. Being able to just go "Computer, create for me an original landscape painting", and have it make one would be something that you'd only find on television/in movies.

It's only made worse by the people who treat it like the Master Computer from Star Trek, claim that it can solve all the problems, and thus attempt to shove it into anything and everything.

It's baffling why my notepad needs to be hooked up to an LLM in the first place. It's a notepad, for quick scribbling. If people want to write something serious in it, there are far better things for that.

In my experience, it's been a bit of a mixed bag. There are some things that work in Linux, and some things that don't, even after a bit of fiddling. My desktop's front panel is completely unusable on Linux, for example.

Windows is at least widespread enough that it's far more likely that parts will work on it at least to some degree. And sure enough, the front panel works fine there.

What were they comparing against? If it was just your average office worker, it might just be the difference between moving and not moving in that time.

Although that really only works as long as the camera doesn't have an IR filter in place.

Unless it wasn't as low as they wanted it. It's at least cheap enough to run that they can afford to drop the pricing on the API compared to their older models.

Do people even focus on their body parts that much on the day-to-day? It seems like something that you wouldn't think about usually.

Link in the description repeats http in a weird place and breaks it.

Here's a working version: https://spectrum.ieee.org/thermodynamic-computing-normal-computing

You joke, but there are already protheses which are proprietary, and have shut down. Artificial eyes is a famous example, where the company making one shut down the product line, and blinded people who'd had it installed, due to it just shutting off.

Only if the alternative was doing nothing. Having to sit down and stay still in a chair for many hours whilst hooked up to machinery doesn't sound like much of an improvement.

Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have

Why is the description a snippet of Rule 3?

Fair play, we did also find out that those powders might have been slowly poisoning people to death.

No, Darknet is just a website that's not listed anywhere. Lemmy is listed in many places.

As has Siri.

It used to have all kinds of plugins, like Wolfram|Alpha, that let you do fun and silly things with it.

It's simply gone downhill ever since.

The new Apple intelligence siri is arguably even worse. I tried asking it what the date would be next Tuesday, all I got back was "I don't understand".

Unintelligent Siri managed to crack that one without fault.

Or that someone could shoot the drone.

Bug.

The original bug was a moth in computer-relays.

Humans are squishy like bug, and behave semi-unpredictably like bug. Therefore, bug.

So where does that put people who have been electrified? Did they simply die of terror because they thought they had grasped a live wire?