OurToothbrush @ OurToothbrush @lemmy.ml

帖子

22

评论

1,595

加入于

2 yr. ago

管理

---

Bisexuals who bring the straight relationship paradigm into dating or the bedroom. (Not all or most bisexuals, but damn, certainly some)

It's mostly just really sad -men need to up their dating game, and a lot of straight sex expectations feel kinda rapey. Like girl it's not normal for your partner to choke you in the middle of sex without asking or prenegotiation and it is weird that you were disappointed that I didn't do that.

there is no way Biden or Harris would have approved the 20 point genocidal plan in the article.

Biden straight up gave arms and support to Israel over his tenure, including after October 7th when the genocide intensified. Biden also supported the genocide.

I’m assuming there was a large violent massacre

Holy shit people just say things

A munch is just a social. People chat and stuff, kinky things don't happen, and it is generally discouraged to use the space for cruising. Different munch dress codes vary from "be very normycore inconspicuous" to "be decent"

Ah, a YouTuber named "habitual linecrosser". Perhaps the "source: it came to me in a dream" commenter was too generous.

Are you claiming you know this from classified information?

Could you cite this please?

What are you talking about have you never heard of emperor Comrade Puyi?

Really good book! A little bit inaccessible in the first two chapters though.

Jokes aside, a good start is to join a socialist org, participate, and start developing yourself politically. I believe cowbee has a good reading list.

But only if you're doing what needs to be done.

Could you cite that please? It isn't that I don't believe you I just want to know where you learned it.

“Pogrom” was coined in Russia and became well known largely because of the Russian Civil War.

Weird I distinctly remember reading about pogromists being one consideration for the bolsheviks in how to participate in the 2nd Duma and that was before the Civil War.

What if fucking over those specific capitalists is a greater win for the capitalist class worldwide?

And if Russia falls it strengthens your enemy at home. An independent shitty Russia is closer to proletarian revolution than a US dominated Russia, and that is what would happen if the US defeated Russia.

Also even if you believe that the democratically elected leadership of China are a new distinct class, they are empirically not capitalists and empirically not violent on anywhere close to a comparable scale to capitalist leadership. Their politics are that of mutual cooperation and advancement because 1a) they understand imperial extraction is economically inefficient in the long term 1b) have sufficient control over the state and economy to prevent it 2) they need strong allies to protect themselves from imperialist encirclement and imperial powers keep trying to weaken the rest of the world

(I don't agree that the Chinese elected leadership constitute a new class, I'm just saying for the sake of talking to folks who do)

Buddy I'm already on team "Fuck the Tsar"

A bloody Civil War to end monarchism is not equivalent to what the US gets up to on a regular basis for the sake of making capitalists richer.

Well you see they shot some monarchists and that's equivalent to murdering tens of millions of brown people somehow.

Actually sexualization- as opposed to attraction- to breasts isn't natural, which is wild. There are plenty of cultures where breasts aren't sexualized, especially near the equator in some traditional cultures where women go topless.

Also as a lesbian in the US who definitely has internalized sexualizing boobs, I don't find it at all distracting when someone isn't wearing a bra. Maybe it is just that I see boobs in non-sexual contexts so it only is sexualized within a sexual context? That might be useful if you're interested in unlearning this habit.

It would be helpful to give specific examples to where you think sources are being misused instead of generally saying that they are being misused.

Could you point out a specific instance where they "they rather cite segments fitting their narrative stands" in a way that misrepresents information?

Thats not how source verification works! Credibility=/= verification! Some nobody citing a lot of firsthand accounts of notable state actors admitting that they did a thing that would be bad for them to admit might be less credible than a mainstream news platform only citing secondary sources but is giving you more verifiable information.