MouseKeyboard @ MouseKeyboard @ttrpg.network

Posts

6

Comments

279

Joined

2 yr. ago

I don't have a problem with having disabled people in a TTRPG setting, but I hate the "it's fantasy, stop whining about realism" argument.

I thought that before I started playing, but since then I have leaned further towards the first two.

My name's, uh, Sapphire Fire.

Thanks to UA warforged and generous magic item allowances (a staff of power and +2 shield I think were the relevant ones for AC) I had a wizard with 28 resting AC (33 with shield).

The bard agrees.

That's how the official rules do it.

More importantly, don't wish for anything that big; keep it in a similar power level to the example wishes. Precise wording won't save you from "the wish might simply fail".

Damn even Razira is blushing

Maybe she's trans

I can't imagine that rule lasting long since any monarch is going to go to great lengths to get rid of it.

In a world with magic a bard could be pretty intimidating.

How powerful are the monarchs? Are they absolute monarchs or far more limited?

I read that in his voice.

The rest of the party when my level 10 hexadin was KOd from almost full health by a storm giant quintessent.

This is why you don't murderhobo. Not all of us are cowards :p

They ran out of their backlog of comics.

Surely sorcerers would be less incest because many of them have non-humanoid ancestors?

Poison immunity (monk), not breathing (various races), blasting open the entrances to increase ventilation

Then they're paying to sustain an evil industry, which is itself evil.

Training a creature to be evil so you can kill it is definitely evil.