EnsignWashout @ EnsignWashout @startrek.website

Posts

1

Comments

233

Joined

2 yr. ago

Beautiful.

I'm finally catching on. Now the game is to try to guess which Golden Girl each line is from.

Same!

Gene, his burger costume emitting a worrisome smell.

General Grievous, his delight in his greeting.

I have a feeling there's a beautiful day in the future when someone asks "Do all Star Trek fans have an uncanny knowledge of 'Golden Girls'?"

And I'll just say "It's a long story."

Somehow I keep being surprised that these brilliant lines are adapted from Golden Girls.

Boimler, his eye first fell on USS Titan's bridge.

I can't get over how the lines of dialog could be traded between Jett and Stamets, and would have a completely different vibe and delivery, but would still work.

because you probably don't know how software is built.

Oh shit. Nevermind then.

What I'm hearing is: I can replace saying "I have a dumb little WordPress blog that no one reads" with "I host a part of the 'Deep Net'.

Sweet.

What do I do if adult tells me they want to play with hot wheels with me? I say yes.

Fuck yeah. Hot wheels are great.

I find it bizarre that people find these obvious cases to prove the tech is worthless. Like saying cars are worthless because they can't go under water.

This reaction is because conmen are claiming that current generations of LLM technology are going to remove our need for experts and scientists.

We're not demanding submersible cars, we're just laughing about the people paying top dollar for the lastest electric car while plannig an ocean cruise.

I'm confident that there's going to be a great deal of broken... everything...built with AI "assistance" during the next decade.

People forgetting that when you ran out of lives you used to have to go back to the start of the whole game.

We remember. It was bullshit back then. It's still bullshit now.

Edit: I beat many of those games on three lives. It was still some bullshit.

I can accept stupid decisions. I don't have to respect them.

Yes. Also folks who have never seen a container ship the size of a hotel pull up to the shipping pier in one of these "landlocked" states.

you'll just have to built your own apps too

We are well on our way.

I was confused before I made the switch. So many of the most useful kinds of apps weren't maintained anymore by anyone on the Google Play store. I had this surreal feeling that the app ecosystem was getting worse every year.

And then I installed F-Droid and figured out where all of my favorite app developers went. ¯(ツ)_/¯

Is it still compatible with all the money I wasted on 3.x Hasbro D&D?

While technically the answer is "no", people who emphasize the difference don't apply the "Rule of Cool" as liberally as I did.

I re-used all kinds of D&D 3rd Edition resources while switching to Pathfinder.

Sure, we absolutely shouldn't just dogmatically use the numbers given in a 3E book with Pathfinder.

But I didn't find it terribly hard to whip up Pathfinder monster and NPC number adjustments based on my 3E source books, more or less on the fly.

Many numbers given are close enough. Most abilities are easy enough to convert in a way that is fun. The Challenge Rating isn't tuned as carefully, but i find the usual GM toolkit can address that. For example, throwing in a few extras baddies from over the hilldside can scale an encounter up, and awarding the players various story advantages "for good role playing" can scale an encounter's challenge down.

If my napkin translation went too badly, I threw "Rule of Cool" at it, and just made sure the players were still having fun.

I will say, I relegated 3E stuff to filler encounters, just as I do with anything else I homebrew.

I don't mind being on my GM toes for a quick encounter, or a short story arc. But I don't like having something poorly balanced have a recurring role in my campaigns.

All to say I have used 3E source books liberally in my Pathfinder campaigns, and I'm not sure any of my players have ever noticed.

T

I hate investing

Mutual Funds / Index funds are your best bet. (Look for descriptive words like "broad", "mix" or "full market" in the description).

If you can, pick out one named "target retirement YYYY" with YYYY being within a few years of whatever year you will turn 67.

It will automatically follow investing best practices based on your current age - agrressive earlier, and very cautious later.

I'm not familiar with all the details of how it works

Perfect recipe to get ripped off. (Most people I know say that insurance/investment combined products suck. I've heard some disagreement whether they're just a bad deal, or such a bad deal they ought to be a crime.)