Communist @ communist @lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz

I'm an anarchocommunist, all states are evil.

---

Read more

Posts

6

Comments

807

Joined

1 yr. ago

yup, which still aligns with my caveat

"Unless you don't want to configure anything"

That's why I said "if you don't want to configure anything"

Of course, I recommend kde to people who don't want to configure anything and want a windows like experience, but when saying something is the best, as they claim, these qualifiers become important.

best for what?

Hate to say it but no, hyprland really is unless you need a windows like experience/don't want to configure anything.

You probably could with a phone

Honestly I don't see any reason to play any game without enhancement mods aside from not wanting to set them up unless you're some sort of game historian.

Not much, llm's and other gen ai crashing and burning change nothing about the fact that ML in general is doing crazy shit. Protein folding getting solved in our lifetimes is insane and there are still way more legit applications, nvidia will be fine.

It's even a work pc, there's a thread on the microsoft forums detailing how common the problem is.

I have had to use windows for like the last two weeks and the taskbar crashes and freezes constantly so I put a bat file on my desktop that kills and reopens explorer.exe also if my bluetooth headphones disconnect while my mic is muted it refuses to unmute... I have to reboot. This is what people say is a "it just works" experience.

It's liquid ass

I'll buy it for 5€, I've already quintoupled the valuation.

Why not pig blood, then?

Mate and xfce are not on wayland yet, so yes, and the biggest things missing are accessibility protocols and xdotool functionality.

I think it's important to note (i'm not an llm I know that phrase triggers you to assume I am) that they haven't proven this as an inherent architectural issue, which I think would be the next step to the assertion.

do we know that they don't and are incapable of reasoning, or do we just know that for x problems they jump to memorized solutions, is it possible to create an arrangement of weights that can genuinely reason, even if the current models don't? That's the big question that needs answered. It's still possible that we just haven't properly incentivized reason over memorization during training.

if someone can objectively answer "no" to that, the bubble collapses.

Oh nothing important, I'm a long way away from home and won't be home for quite a while, meaning I can't test myself and am curious of the status of wine-wayland.

Thanks that's helpful.

Are you using -git?

Thank you I really appreciate your kind words.