BlueMonday1984 @ BlueMonday1984 @awful.systems

he/they

---

Read more

Posts

100

Comments

1,177

Joined

2 yr. ago

I originally planned to mention it was only senior programmers who'd likely benefit - I definitely screwed up leaving it on the cutting room floor.

Adding that now.

Good catch, I'll quickly update my post now.

I decided to look deeper into that subreddit, and I found the most utterly cursed sentence I've read all week (coming from the aptly-titled "Why 99% of YouTubers Fail (And How to Be the 1% That Doesn't)"):

If that doesn't sum up everything wrong with AI sloppers in a single sentence, I don't know what does.

EDIT: Incorrectly claimed it came from "My Unethical Strategy to Hit 4000 Hours Watch Time in 40 Days" - fixed that now.

except they have none of the academic ability of the TESCREAL authors

This has two potential readings, and both of them are funny.

Ed Zitron has chimed in on OpenAI's woes, directly comparing their situation to a dying MMO:

Zitron is in a pretty good position to make this comparison - he worked as a games journalist in the '00s before pivoting to working in public relations.

In other news, Politico's management has gone on record stating their AI tools aren't being held to newsroom editorial standards, in an arbitration hearing trying to resolve a major union dispute.

This is some primo Pivot to AI material, if I do say so myself.

New piece from Brian Merchant, about the growing power the AI bubble's granted Microsoft, Google, and Amazon: The AI boom is fueling a land grab for Big Cloud

ZITRON DROPPED

Another day, another case of "personal responsibility" used to shift blame for systemic issues, and scapegoat the masses for problems bad actors actively imposed on them.

Its not like we've heard that exact same song and dance a million times before, I'm sure the public hasn't gotten sick and tired of it by this point.

Probable hot take: this shit's probably also hampering people's efforts to overcome self-serving bias, as well - taking responsibility for your own faults is hard enough in a vacuum, its likely even harder when bad actors act with impunity by shifting the blame to you.

I like the DNF / vaporware analogy, but did we ever have a GPT Doom or Duke3d killer app in the first place? Did I miss it?

In a literal sense, Google did attempt to make GPT Doom, and failed (i.e. a large language model can't run Doom).

In a metaphorical sense, the AI equivalent to Doom was probably AI Dungeon, a roleplay-focused chatbot viewed as quite impressive when it released in 2020.

Ed Zitron's given his thoughts on GPT-5's dumpster fire launch:

Personally, I can see his point - the Duke Nukem Forever levels of hype around GPT-5 set the promptfondlers up for Duke Nukem Forever levels of disappointment with GPT-5, and the "deaths" of their AI waifus/therapists this has killed whatever dopamine delivery mechanisms they've set up for themselves.

Anyways, personal sidenote/prediction: I suspect the Internet Archive’s gonna have a much harder time archiving blogs/websites going forward.

Me, two months ago

Looks like I was on the money - Reddit's began limiting what the Internet Archive can access, claiming AI corps have been scraping archived posts to get around Reddit's pre-existing blocks on scrapers. Part of me suspects more sites are gonna follow suit pretty soon - Reddit's given them a pretty solid excuse to use.

You're dead right on that.

Part of me suspects STEM in general (primarily tech, the other disciplines look well-protected from the fallout) will have to deal with cleaning off the stench of Eau de Fash after the dust settles, with tech in particular viewed as unequipped to resist fascism at best and out-and-proud fascists at worst.

Iris van-Rooij found AI slop in the wild (determining it as such by how it mangled a word's definition) and went on find multiple other cases. She's written a blog post about this, titled "AI slop and the destruction of knowledge".

New Blood in the Machine about GPT-5's dumpster fire launch: GPT-5 is a joke. Will it matter?

I wrote yesterday about red-team cybersecurity and how the attack testing teams don’t see a lot of use for AI in their jobs. But maybe the security guys should be getting into AI. Because all these agents are a hilariously vulnerable attack surface that will reap rich rewards for a long while to come.

Hey, look on the bright side, David - the user is no longer the weakest part of a cybersecurity system, so they won't face as many social engineering attempts on them.

Seriously, though, I fully expect someone's gonna pull off a major breach through a chatbot sooner or later. We're probably overdue for an ILOVEYOU-level disaster.

It'll probably earn a lot of users if and when Github goes down the shitter. They've publicly stood with marginalised users before, so they're already in my good books.

Tante fires off about web search:

There used to be this deal between Google (and other search engines) and the Web: You get to index our stuff, show ads next to them but you link our work. AI Overview and Perplexity and all these systems cancel that deal.

And maybe - for a while - search will also need to die a bit? Make the whole web uncrawlable. Refuse any bots. As an act of resistance to the tech sector as a whole.

On a personal sidenote, part of me suspects webrings and web directories will see a boost in popularity in the coming years - with web search in the shitter and AI crawlers being a major threat, they're likely your safest and most reliable method of bringing human traffic to your personal site/blog.

Well, what’s next, and how much work is it?

I'm not particularly sure myself. By my guess, I don't expect one specific profession to be "what's next", but a wide variety of professions becoming highly lucrative, primarily those which can exploit the fallout of the AI bubble to their benefit. Giving some predictions:

• Therapists and psychiatrists should find plenty of demand, as mental health crisis and cases of AI psychosis provide them a steady stream of clients.
• Those in writing related jobs (e.g. copywriters) can likely squeeze hefty premiums from clients with AI-written work that needs fixing.
• Programmers may find themselves a job tearing down the mountains of technical debt introduced by vibe-coding, and can probably crowbar a premium out of desperate clients as well. (This one's probably gonna be limited to senior coders, though - juniors are likely getting the shaft on this front)

As for which degrees will come into high demand, I expect it will be mainly humanities degrees that benefit - either directly through netting you a profession that can exploit the AI fallout, or indirectly through showing you have skills that an LLM can't imitate.

I didn’t want to be a computing professional. I trained as a jazz pianist

Nice. You could probably earn some cash doing that on the side.

At some point we ought to focus on the real problem: not STEM, not humanities, but business schools and MBA programs.

You're goddamn right.

Not only that, the reported development of post-quantum cryptography (with NIST having released some finalised encryption standards last year) could give cybersec professionals a headstart on protecting everything if it fully comes to fruition (assuming said cryptography lives up to its billing).

You want me to take a shot in the dark, I expect zero-knowledge proofs will manage to break into the mainstream before quantum computing becomes a thing - minimising the info you give out is good for protecting your users' privacy, and minimises the amount of info would-be attackers could work with.