KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24 @ AnarchistsForKamala @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

192

Joined

1 yr. ago

Moderating

---

We could just feed a tenth of the corn to people and get rid of the cows

except that the field corn fed to cattle is not human-digestable, either.

the soybean products fed to livestock are, by and large, the byproducts of pressing soybeans for oil. feeding industrial waste to animals is a good use and actually a conservation of resources.

corn fed beef cattle aren't fed exclusively corn. they're grass-fed grain-finished. they spend about a year grazing before going to a feedlot for around 6 months.

for most people making taht decision does not involve killing anything. both options have already been harvested and presented.

no one said that. you're making a leap of logic.

that's not killing for pleasure.

it's not logical, either.

And you make this judgement every day as well, even if you refuse to admit it

an absolutely unfalsifiable claim.

whatever you are doing over there it isn't science.

saying it doesn't make it true. you have presented no proof, so no one should believe you

I don't think you have the ability to treat other users as fully human

you have no proof for your claim. no one should believe you

Nobody can be certain of anyone’s intentions on the Internet,

except you, apparently, who is certain they can tell a good faith actor from a bad faith actor based solely on whether they have an opinion you have seen or one you agree with

the odds that they’re not are vastly greater.

you are making that up

you are actively trying to get Trump elected and you are actively making the world a worse place.

you are making a leap of logic

wrong

Can you please explain what the difference is between an action being causal of another action vs an action… causing another action to happen?

i don't think you're capable of understanding cause and effect, so i guess this is done.

with zero supporting evidence or reason

wrong

An argument’s a collective series of statements to establish a definite proposition.

i'm not making an argument. i'm contradicting yours.

If this were true, it would lead to the absurd conclusion that hiring a hitman to kill someone would not make you complicit in the act, because, by your logic “they make their own decisions” regardless of who’s paying them to do what.

again, this is completely disanalagous with buying meat on a shelf.

You claimed that purchasing meat has no effect on whether more meat gets produced, because “they make their own decisions.”

wrong. i said it is not causal.