KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24 @ AnarchistsForKamala @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

192

Joined

1 yr. ago

Moderating

---

https://lemmy.world/c/anarchistsforkamala

he is not fully funded by the right.

voting for a so-called third party is voting against Trump

turn a blind eye to the black bloc stalking them

I'm probably gonna vote for her, but this is dunk-brained.

do you know how I know that you didn't read the article?

that blog post and petition are significantly more than just saying it's stupid

as was already said elsewhere, advocating for an emoji is silly, and advocating against one might be sillier.

maybe you should use the public infrastructure.

maybe no one you talk to, but I assure you, it happens. it is happening right now, in this conversation

while there may not be an emoji for http, maybe there should be. there is sort of an unofficial one (a broken lock), and there are other protocols that have logos. as another commenter said, it's kind of silly to fight for an emojii for it, and probably sillier to fight against it.

the sewer is infrastructure. i don't think you understand the network protocol.

if you can't present evidence, then you're just spreading uncertainty and doubt.

if this is true, there would be some evidence

yes, it is. anyone can spin up a node or download the blockchain or make an address.

Bitcoin is a network protocol. not a brand.

I can't have comments removed since I'm not a mod

you should give a trigger warning when you link gore

i read your op, and i thought you were sincere. i am surprised to now see that you think sarcasm is wit, and that protesting shouldn't inconvenience people.

how have you not caught a banhammer yet?

This is a huge problem with the FPTP system, but that’s the law for this election. It would be great to change it, but that’s talk for the next one. Voting for a third party ensures that the party you like the least will win in a FPTP system. CGP explains it best: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo

that is not the correct analysis. the correct analysis is that strategic voting leads to party consolidation, so the solution is values voting, even if you think another party that has somewhat close values has a better chance of winning.