Aren't there compiler warnings for potential overflows already, that come in the form of warning: something when compiling? Aren't runtime overflows detected using the coredump in gdb, not gcc?
Shiny ASCII art seems like a waste of time and/or calling the dev stupid. What am i missing here?
I.e. it's now even harder to run your own mail server.
If it was crypto-related the argument would be Think of the children™, since it's email the excuse is spam.
if you can’t understand how that would make some people uncomfortable then you might be a bit lacking in empathy.
I'm lacking in empathy.
The 3d world has Utah teapots and Stanford bunnies and dragons which are all very neutral and don’t hurt anyone.
Ooooh i'm sure someone, somewhere, somehow will feel offended. Better ban those too.
Yes, the provenance is "questionable", but it's a pic of a human wearing a hat, ffs.
The model being tired of it would be enough reason for me to stop using it (as you mentioned, there are plenty of alternatives); but American prudeness? No.
I do wonder, however, if more recent papers (2010 and forward) using that image were doing so as reference to older papers, or entirely contained to their own research.
I hadn't heard of this before this post, the pic is innocuous enough, i wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people don't even know that's a crop of an old magazine photo.
Because the tech-illiterate people who have authority only know "productivity" tools and couldn't care less about the opinions of the people who actually know what they're doing.
Aren't there compiler warnings for potential overflows already, that come in the form of
warning: somethingwhen compiling? Aren't runtime overflows detected using the coredump ingdb, notgcc?Shiny ASCII art seems like a waste of time and/or calling the dev stupid. What am i missing here?