The prospect of a second Trump presidency has the intelligence community on edge
The prospect of a second Trump presidency has the intelligence community on edge
Trump sought major changes at the intel agencies in his first term; former officials say he could be more radical in a second.
Former top officials from Donald Trump’s administration are warning he is likely to use a second term to overhaul the nation’s spy agencies in a way that could lead to an unprecedented level of politicization of intelligence.
You're viewing a single thread.
Damn, I guess the Democrats should put up a strong candidate.
Biden is the strongest polling candidate against Trump
The way I am going to go into this election is to vote 3rd party. If trump wins, he will either have a very underwhelming term and lose his fanbase or completely destroy the government and break the status quo. Assuming he goes the extreme route, the US will either rise up and competely reform the government or we had no hope of that ever happening in the first place. I'm tired of voting for the lesser evil.
Edit: Disliking this comment is cool and all, but I'd like to actually hear why people disagree. I am willing to change my mind if an adequate reason is provided. For anyone saying there will be domestic pain if Trump is elected, I am living in the US as well. This will also open the eyes of people who think politics are separate from their lives.
Edit2: Thanks for responding, I really appreciate the given perspectives. I am not a politics major, so I know there is always more I can learn.
Edit3: Thank you to those who provided legitimate reasoning and sources. It looks like the only viable option is to avoid a repeat of history, where the minority Nazi party ended up running Germany, by voting for Genocide Joe. God I hate this bs political system.
The way I am going to go into this election is to vote 3rd party
That's just voting for Trump with extra steps.
If trump wins, he will either have a very underwhelming term and lose his fanbase or completely destroy the government and break the status quo
Nothing here has any bearing in reality or past precedence. It won't matter if Trump "wins" by one vote or twenty votes, his behavior will be exactly the same (and the people pulling his strings will enact their plans regardless.). He certainly acted like he had a "mandate" during his first term despite losing the popular vote, and he's not a complex force to understand- he will absolutely be worse the second time.
Assuming he goes the extreme route, the US will either rise up and competely reform the government or we had no hope of that ever happening in the first place.
GTFO here with that accelerationist bullshit. You don't like Biden? Fine- you're free to. Hold your nose and vote for him anyway, because things are going to get a lot worse for a lot of people if you don't. The US system isn't set up to allow people to vote ideologically, so we have to vote strategically. The sooner American voters grow up and accept that fact, the sooner we can start working to actually fix the system.
How many times have the Democrats held power and done absolutely nothing with it? How long do we have to keep voting for the lesser evil? Why is the main platform the Democrats are running on that "Trump is evil, so vote for Biden"? Is the strongest candidate the Democrats can provide a genocidal old man?
I don't expect anything substantial to happen with Democrats. Change will not come from them.
I do know that Republicans under Trump will do everything they can to actively stop change from the places it can come from, which is the bottom-up.
How many times have the Democrats held power and done absolutely nothing with it?
Far too often.
How long do we have to keep voting for the lesser evil?
Until you can get enough people in the government who want to change it. Get rid of the FPTP system then you can vote for whoever you want.
Why is the main platform the Democrats are running on that “Trump is evil, so vote for Biden”?
...what sane person needs more than that? We already know how bad Trump was the first time, and we know already what he and his handlers are planning for a second term. I have no idea why that's not sufficient motivation.
Is the strongest candidate the Democrats can provide a genocidal old man?
Again, the alternative is Donald Fucking Trump. Is Biden the "best" choice for America? If we're talking in terms of progress, probably not- but he's the best choice the money behind the Democratic Party is willing to support.
That’s just voting for Trump with extra steps.
no, it's not. only voting for trump is voting for trump.
That is demonstrably wrong under a "first past the post" system. You either vote for the candidate from the major party that is closest-aligned to your values, or your vote helps the candidate from the major party that is furthest aligned from you to win. It doesn't matter how much you hate it or want it to be wrong, it's a mathematical certainty. Like I already said, Americans don't get to vote ideologically precisely because the system doesn't allow it. If you think Donald Trump is the absolute worst candidate on the field, then any vote other than for (the presumed Democratic candidate) Biden is just helping Trump win.
I don't want Biden or Trump to win. I have an ideological opposition to voting for people I don't want to win.
You either vote for the candidate from the major party that is closest-aligned to your values, or your vote helps the candidate from the major party that is furthest aligned from you to win.
this is election misinformation. a vote for Jill Stein cannot be counted as a vote for trump or Biden.
On paper it's a vote for Jill, but in effect it's a vote for the party you dislike more. Are you more of a practical person or more of a person concerned with technicalities?
Are you more of a practical person or more of a person concerned with technicalities?
there is no reason one excludes the other. and, in practice, if they count my vote for Biden or Trump, they are cheating.
This
this is election misinformation.
is wrong, because this
a vote for Jill Stein cannot be counted as a vote for trump or Biden.
isn't what I said.
the only way a vote can help a candidate win is if it is a vote for that candidate
A third party vote is a vote for whoever you hate most.
In first past the post voting, like we have today, you don't vote for a candidate. You vote against the candidate you hate the most. Only the two leading parties matter. This is a fact, not an opinion. Evidence in the link below.
So if you really hate Biden the most, and you vote third party, you're effectively handing Biden a vote.
Here's a short cute video that helped me wrap my brain around it. https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo?si=lK4IKv2MF4uXI6UI
Thank you, very informative!
Assuming he goes the extreme route, the US will either rise up and competely reform the government or we had no hope of that ever happening in the first place.
So, accelerationism. Which does not work.
Would you mind linking a video or article you would recommend on why accelerationism is a bad thing? I can look it up, but if you have any recommendations, it would make it a lot faster.
https://richardcoyne.com/2017/05/14/whats-wrong-with-accelerationism/
Some of the left wing parties of Weimar Germany thought that letting Hitler have power would inevitably collapse the system. It'd get so bad that the people would have to spark the revolution.
Obviously, it didn't work out that way. The Nazis left Germany in ruins, and what came out of the ashes was a split country. The western half became as neoliberal capitalist as the rest of western Europe (though with more of the sharp edges filled off compared to the United States today), and the eastern half fell under the USSR's own unique form of fascism.
To be clear: fascism is ultimately self defeating. How it fails has a range of possibilities, but it doesn't end in a clear path towards a great communist utopia.
Ah, read the article and a few others. I would say that my current views are close to Left-Wing Accelerationism. To my understanding, the issue with Accelerationism is the gamble it would be taking on the majority views of USA occupants? I.E. if the majority is right leaning we will most likely end up worse off for a while, while if the majority is left leaning, we will be in a much better place than we started. With the potential price being thousands of lives. Which is why the Left is pushing for Biden votes, so that risk is removed and we at least keep the status quo. Right?
I really, really, appreciate seeing someone not dig their heels in at the sight of downvotes and actually continuing the conversation to learn about the other perspective.
Kudos to you, and thank you for reminding me why I hate Reddit and other social media where opinions are unchangeable and there is no grey between black and white.