The One Climate Policy All 2024 Candidates Support Is Actually Terrible | Ethanol is a comically inefficient form of solar energy—and a toxic one. Solar panels would be better

newrepublic.com

The One Climate Policy All 2024 Candidates Support Is Actually Terrible

16 comments

This is the stupid shit we get for letting Iowa always be first in the nominating contests.
Like, the solution has become very clear and apparent.
Solar panels and batteries on all homes. Wind energy wherever possible with gridscale backup. Electric vehicles for anything with an axle-weight below 10k. Hydrogen (if we must) for everything above 10k, until we have batteries with weight to performance ratios that can support trucking with electric.
Climate change and carbon reductions are only a technical issue if you insist that every one be working all of the time to justify their existence. Appreciating that most of almost everyones work is just 'busy' work in the exercise of justifying our existence, we could easily solve this issue.
- Appreciating that most of almost everyones work is just ‘busy’ work in the exercise of justifying our existence, we could easily solve this issue.
  Not to mention how much pollution commuting to do the busy work causes!
- Hydrogen (if we must) for everything above 10k, until we have batteries with weight to performance ratios that can support trucking with electric.
  Hydrogen is even dumber than ethanol.
  The better solution is to minimize the number of vehicles that need to be long-range and self-powered in the first place by aggressively improving rail infrastructure (including electrifying it), and then run the bit that's left on biodiesel sourced from waste feedstocks.
  
  I mean I only begrudgingly support hydrogen, because in theory, it can be produced by renewables and we do need something more energy dense for things that move heavy things.
- Actually, big rigs being all ev is fine for last mile / in-city delivery.
  
  You want any shipping to back heavily on rail for any distance, don't you?
  
  Germany's electrified highway system looks very promising for longer distance truck transport too. It's basically the same system that overhead electrified rail uses. That way the battery only needs to be able to get the truck to and from that highway, the distance covered on the highway is charging time.
Not all candidates. Just all democrat and republican candidates.
- So all actual candidates.
  
  Self fulfilling prophecies
Compare this to gasoline. Same engine, right?
For cars older than a decade, is it or is it not marginally better than inefficient and toxic gasoline?
- There's a fair bit of evidence that the ethanol is worse:
  the carbon intensity of corn ethanol produced under the RFS is no less than gasoline and likely at least 24% higher

16 comments