Skip Navigation

Technology @lemmy.ml

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ @lemmy.ml

3w ago

Cutting-edge research shows language is not the same as intelligence. The entire AI bubble is built on ignoring it.

www.theverge.com

Is language the same as intelligence? The AI industry desperately needs it to be

Technology @lemmy.zip

cm0002 @infosec.pub

3w ago

Cutting-edge research shows language is not the same as intelligence. The entire AI bubble is built on ignoring it.

www.theverge.com /ai-artificial-intelligence/827820/large-language-models-ai-intelligence-neuroscience-problems

Fuck AI @lemmy.world

streetfestival @lemmy.ca

3w ago

Is language the same as intelligence? The AI industry desperately needs it to be

www.theverge.com /ai-artificial-intelligence/827820/large-language-models-ai-intelligence-neuroscience-problems

ChatGPT @lemdro.id

ooli3 @sopuli.xyz

3w ago

Is language the same as intelligence? The AI industry desperately needs it to be

www.theverge.com /ai-artificial-intelligence/827820/large-language-models-ai-intelligence-neuroscience-problems

9 comments

Um...yeah. About ten seconds of critical thinking also shows that language is not the same as intelligence.
- But is the average finance bro capable of ten seconds of critical thinking?
  
  Money throws logic out the window 10/10 times cant recommend.
The title is false. The cited paper deals with connection between language and intelligence however a) it does not comment on current AI bubble and b) current AI research does not assume language is the same as intelligence. It’s an example of scientists saying something and journalists extrapolating from that to get a story out of it. Reminds me of On Human (and) Nature.
- The title is not false. If you actually bothered to read the article, you'd see that the argument being made is that the AI tech companies are selling a vision to their investors that's at odds with the research. The current LLM based approach to AI cannot achieve general intelligence.
  
  Even the article admits that AI researchers are aware that LLMs are not sufficient. So the title is absolutely false. The article uses research which has very little to do with the subject to springboard into an opinion piece which itself observes that actually the premiss of the opinion is incorrect.

9 comments