I’m thoroughly enjoying these. If you’re taking suggestions, it’s not the first time Jim Jordan has covered for sexual misconduct of abusers; he’s kind of a low hanging branch.
Don't matter how low the fruit is hangin' when you hungry, brotherrrr
Never change and godspeed brudder
ELI5?
Head of house oversight committee has decided that the Epstein situation is not recent enough to be worthy of the House's time. (He's covering up for the pedos)
The only logical conclusion I can come up with is that James Comer is named in the Epstein files and is a pedophile.
Those women are still alive, capable of testimony, and his sidekick is still serving her sentence. I know statute of limitations affects the ability to charge people, but you're supposed to be compiling a record of some heinous shit that prosecutors could have put a stop to, but didn't. Unless you're one of the guilty parties, you have no reason to refuse this.
You say that, but I have yet to make bread
Aw, man, I felt bad, didn't delete in time though.
I’m thoroughly enjoying these. If you’re taking suggestions, it’s not the first time Jim Jordan has covered for sexual misconduct of abusers; he’s kind of a low hanging branch.
Don't matter how low the fruit is hangin' when you hungry, brotherrrr
Never change and godspeed brudder