Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features
Let us git rid of it, angry GitHub users say of forced Copilot features

GitHub Copilot on autopilot as community complaints persist

Among the software developers who use Microsoft's GitHub, the most popular community discussion in the past 12 months has been a request for a way to block Copilot, the company's AI service, from generating issues and pull requests in code repositories.
The second most popular discussion – where popularity is measured in upvotes – is a bug report that seeks a fix for the inability of users to disable Copilot code reviews.
from the comments of the article that got the most upvotes
I agree with the first paragraph, this is just another M$ EEE. Utilizing source codes on github to train their AI to be smarter in coding. So they can promote vibe coding to people with a little or no experience in coding.
This is not what Embrace, Extend, Extinguish is. Embrace, maybe, sure. The Extend part is functionality that is critical or that people want to use. This isn't that. (And then Extinguish is to use the Extension to eliminate the open source competition.)
The article kind of lines out how they interpret 'extend' here, but as you say, it isn't perfect. Perhaps 'eeritate' or 'egg on' would fit better. Elbow?