Trump deploys National Guard after second day of Los Angeles immigration protests | CNN
Trump deploys National Guard after second day of Los Angeles immigration protests | CNN
President Donald Trump has signed a presidential memorandum deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to disperse protests over immigration activity in the Los Angeles area, the White House said in a statement Saturday night.
You're viewing a single thread.
If you don't own a gun, its time to get one, regardless of your stance on them. This is martial law without having to call it that.
Gavin Newson specifically said that he did not ask for or need the 2,000 troops and that sending to LA would only make things worse.
Sooo, there’s that.
Legally I believe the National Guard must be mobilized for a legal reason and until Trump has identified an actual cause, he cannot mobilize them himself. So Newson should just order them to stand down.
Newson hasn't done that though.
"oh, Trump wouldn't do that, it's illegal"
Phew, what a relief!
Also, when Trump does illegal stuff, people tend to allow it and obey him. If they try to shut him down using the legal system, he goes ahead and does it anyway.
I kind of just roll my eyes when someone says, "Aha, it's illegal! He can't do that!" We don't really live in that world anymore.
My emphasis was more on Newsom not ordering them to stand down. They're under his command until a legal order from the POTUS supercedes his command.
There is no challenging the military as the citizenry. This is terrible advice.
What we should be doing is encouraging insubordination by service members. Why the fuck would you agree to use military force against your fellow Americans, on American soil? Not only is that unconstitutional, it's simply not what you signed up for. Say no
Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and most of South America would disagree with you.
Anyway. GovCo can't win anyway. Not even in open hot war. They don't have the numbers.
Military and Natl Guard combined are less than 3,000,000 people. And that includes the logistics that makes it all work. They couldn't handle Afghanistan and its <50,000,000 people.
You overestimate how willing people are to throw their bodies at the problem. Things have to be so bad that they expect to die anyway. Otherwise, your militia sign-ups will be limited to only those most brave, ideological, or stupid.
You also underestimate how much more effective military training and ordinances are among the US military vs militias. If they really wanted to mow down civilians, it would be fish in a barrel, even if everyone in the militia is armed.
This is why the hope is that US service men are committed to the constitution and not to Drumpf's orders. It's a thin hope.
They're committed to the paycheck. Don't be naive. Do you think American soldiers are uniquely unable to carry out atrocities? That sweet salty buttery baby jesus is gonna reach down, touch their hearts and make them defy orders? I'll refer you to uh, the last 25 years of action in the middle east.
This empire is dying live on TV. And all of them so far have ended bloody. We won't be the exception.
I did say it was a thin hope (well I said 'thing' but I've corrected it now).
But I think you give your service men too little credit. Even the police. How many fatalities or even serious injuries have actually occurred during protest activities? These a generally not people who want to kill anyone, particularly not their American brothers and sisters. But when one side dehumanizes the other, all bets are off. If things actually become life threatening, then everything changes. Kill or be killed.
I'm happy to be surprised. But I have set my expectations appropriately low.
I expect some inciting event over the summer. Someone gets killed by the feds and those protests really do turn into real riots. Then the clown prince will escalate. Open war by Christmas.
Like I said. I'm happy to be proven wrong. I would be delighted to be proven wrong. Maybe we'll luck out and he'll have a stroke mid ramble or maybe some general will shoot the bastard during his military parade. But I don't think we're that lucky.
Another possible is a general strike. That Union leader they black bagged earlier this week. He hasn't been released yet. If they try to deport him on some trumped up bullshit that's gonna have an apocalyptic backlash from basically every union except the police union.
There is no challenging the military as the citizenry
Says someone from the nation that mainly loses military conflicts with the citizenry....
Where do you think I'm from?
Based on your statement referencing the constitution I would say the states, but if I am mistaken then I apologize.
Oh nah, I'm from the south. We're all descendents of the British colonies at the end of the day though.
Rereading your comment, I can appreciate the irony. I guess I'm trying to talk my American friends out of aspiring toward the next civil war. I don't think they realize just how good they have it despite the police crack downs. It's what gives me some small hope if actually ordered to fire on civilians... They wouldn't.
yeah. not with that attitude.