Opera Debuts 'One' Browser With Built-in Generative AI
Opera Debuts 'One' Browser With Built-in Generative AI
www.gizmodo.com.au
Opera Debuts 'One' Browser With Built-in Generative AI
23 comments
-
-
Sheesh, Opera remember when Opera was the best choice for users with slow internet? Remember the great built-in email client and XMPP clients? Now...this?
-
-
The company that owns Opera nowadays is pretty shady, I'd never trust their code to run on any of my devices.
-
-
-
The tab stacking and visual mouse gestures were awesome back in the day! I'd never use a modern Opera product (and stopped after they switched to Chromium) unfortunately the company that owns it made a bunch of money through predatory payday loan apps in a few developing countries.
-
Oh yeah I totally forgot about gestures. That was a neat feature at the time.
-
-
If Opera had stayed in its lane, it would be pretty much Vivaldi.
-
-
-
Why climb a mountain? Why eat an elephant? Why wear pants?
-
-
Who gave the approval on the
"OPE-
RA
ONE"It's bad, really bad. If they wanted to have it split they could have at least played with it like this:
"OP
ERA
ONE"
Make it sound like the new browser is OP and it's the era of ONE, One Opera. But you know, whatever. -
I already don't trust a Chinese browser in of itself, so I'm sure as hell not going to trust a Chinese browser with an integrated AI.
-
Not trusting a company that offered predatory loans with my data
Though I don’t trust any company/ai with my data I think most people here do
-
Am game as long as the AI runs locally, and doesn't siphon every website I visit to their server.
-
Bonzi Buddy has entered the chat.
-
It doesn't appear to
-
-
They changed the UI a bit, added 2 useless features and called it a day. Who the hell needs 5 different browsers?
23 comments
I don't get what generative ai could add to my browsing experience. How ever I do think it makes a good search engine.
a "search engine" that hallucinates results, including but not limited to non-existent court cases.
And what? Half the shit on Google is completely wrong as well.
I’d use some sort of generative “find on page” or “summarize page” where I could have a quick Q/A without needing to read a long article.