My least favorite thing about Flatpak

Which basically means your least favorite thing about flatpak is flatpak.

Don't get me wrong,but why do you think it's so easy to install apps via flatpak?

For me the benefit of having dependencies containerized is well worth the wasted space or system dependency incompatibilities.

Oh yeah for sure, I just thought it was funny. I explicitly install most things through my primary package manager, but for some things in my use case, Flatpak is definitely the call!

I don't understand (im new to Linux)

So, I only have 3 applications installed through Flatpak (Bottles, discord-screenaudio, and Protontricks), but for compatibility sake Flatpak will have a few different NVIDIA drivers and their 32bit versions installed for application functionality.
Most of the time, between updates I will have 3-4 different ones installed at any given time. It's nothing super upsetting, but it is "Mildly Infuriating" as its a slight loss of a couple gigabytes of space.
- ah that makes a lot more sense, thanks!
  as an aside, how has discord-screenaudio been working for you? I saw a couple reviews that said it might steal my discord credentials and held off getting it, but it'd be really nice to be able to share my screen with audio again
I don't understand (I have been using linux for 2 years)
- Believe me, even after 28y using Linux this is a tough one.
  Is flatpack another package manager like snap with it's own dependency hell?
- It doesn't optimise storage, it does exactly the opposite. The point is to try to reduce dependencies by having everything in one atomic unit. This means if two programmes would use the same library you waste space by having it installed twice, but if two programmes use different versions of the same library you don't have dependency problems because they each have their own copy to work from. I can see the pros and cons but personally I don't have a use for it so I avoids it

That's why I don't use them. I love the idea, don't get me wrong, but seeing all these gigabytes being taken away from me hurts. lol

Especially when it installs into your home partition. That just feels like my personal space has been invaded. Had to link it to a folder in /opt
- Lol. I might do that if I install a flatpak
- I use xfs since it is the only one that I have zero issues with. Also, I don't need flatpaks (rarely do), the AUR basically has everything I personally need.
- Wait, what now?
  That sounds awesome!

yesterday i tried to delete snap-store, it took firefox with it, and then i got no browser to troubleshoot that.

tried to install firefox from flatpak, it installed it but it disappears after restart.

dealing with linux felt like this lately https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=D7OmauE8FEU

had to reinstall ubuntu 3 facking times :/

Next time install Fedora!
- 2nd Fedora recommendation in a week!
That is because in ubuntu firefox is installed as snap by default, as for the flatpak version i do not know what happened. If you want firefox as a deb you need to add a ppa and then you can apt install firefox. There are lots of guides. All of these package managers can be confusing at times
- i should have known: i didnt have a browser to download anything, i could have downloaded firefox.deb with phone or something then install it
  of these package managers can be confusing at times
  exactly.

I don't know, man. Unless you're running on ancient hardware does a few gigs even really matter? I've got a 1 TB nvme in my box and I'm using like 300 gigs of it, 200 gigs of which are two Steam games and a few different Proton versions. Surely the 2 gigs shown in that screenshot is almost meaningless in a modern system. I mean you can get a 1 TB Samsung EVO for like 60 bucks on Amazon these days.