US vetoes another UN Security Council resolution seeking Gaza ceasefire
US vetoes another UN Security Council resolution seeking Gaza ceasefire
Call for ceasefire in Gaza receives 14 votes in favour, with Washington being the lone veto
The measure received 14 votes in favour, with the US the sole member to reject it. However, because the US is a permanent member of the council, it has the ability to veto any resolution brought forward
Unlike several previous resolutions regarding a ceasefire in Gaza, Wednesday's measure was brought forward by all 10 elected members of the Security Council.
The US has vetoed four previous attempts at calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, on most occasions being the lone vote against the measures.
You're viewing a single thread.
What absolute pieces of shit. Can't even bother to do the right thing when it doesn't even matter anymore.
Why is it wrong to call for the immediate release of the Israeli hostages in Gaza in exchange for a ceasefire? How does the prolonged suffering of the hostages and their families help the people of Gaza in any way? Is a unilateral ceasefire that doesn't guarantee the immediate return of the hostages "doing the right thing" to you?
Not that it never mattered anyway. The UN doesn't control whether a ceasefire happens or not, only the Israelis and Palestinians can decide when to lay down their weapons and release the hostages--and that should have happened a fucking year ago.
Stop putting words in other people's mouths.
The ceasefire is about widescale collective punishment of a population that is half children resulting in famine and genocide. My point is the Biden administration could do the right thing for once instead of enabling it until the bitter end.
I'm not putting words in your mouth...
The US's stated reason for rejecting the [toothless, unenforceable, bureaucratic, performative] UN ceasefire proposal was that it did not call for the "immediate release of Israeli hostages from Gaza".
To that end, you said that they "can’t even bother to do the right thing when it doesn’t even matter anymore", which to me very clearly shows that you believe that it is wrong (or, not right) to reject an agreement that fails to call for the immediate release of the hostages.
In my view, the right thing to do is very, very simple--as simple as it has been for over 13 months: agree to a ceasefire in exchange for the immediate release of all Israeli hostages in Gaza (dead or alive). A unilateral ceasefire that doesn't guarantee the immediate return of hostages doesn't make any sense to me, how about you?
It was also "collective punishment" for Hamas to go on a rampage on October 6th, 2023, raping, murdering and kidnapping innocent Israeli civilians, including men, women, children and seniors. Some of these hostages, if they are even still alive, have been held in what kind of horrific conditions for more than a year... Kept in a dungeon, repeatedly tortured, never having seen the light of day for over a fucking year... Something tells me you wouldn't be so quick to agree to a unilateral ceasefire if someone you loved was held captive for 13 months, now would you?
The US was right to reject this performative political UN bullshit.
The second paragraph in the article:
The draft resolution was aimed at calling for an "immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire" in Gaza and the release of all hostages held by Palestinian groups in the enclave.
You're so right, a terrorist organization kidnapped civilians after launching a single day invasion via hang glider.
Better not hold the nation state with jet powered aircraft and tanks waging a 400 day invasion to a higher standard than the common terrorist.
Now who's putting words in other people's mouths? 😂
If you had a leg to stand on in this discussion you wouldn't resort to pathetic non sequitur.
Hamas was [supposedly] the legitimately elected government of the Gaza Strip. To think that they could go on a murderous rampage (in which they killed more people in a single day than the Israelis have in any day since then, by the way), take hostages back into Gaza, hide behind innocent women and children like the worthless pathetic Islamist terrorist cowards that they are, and not face the direct consequences of their actions, is a joke.
I guess when you worship a pedophile who spread his ideology through violent genocide (including in historical Gaza), logic and consequence isn't your strong point.
Still, I don't understand why you are so dramatically opposed to the idea of releasing the hostages? What's in it for you that these people are needlessly tortured? Do you think it helps offset the harm against the innocent Gazans?
I'm not opposed to the release of hostages, I think it's a stupid reason to veto a ceasefire meant to end famine.