1y ago

Pity US voters their choice of leaders. Surely democracy is better than this? | Simon Tisdall

www.theguardian.com

7 comments

Articles like this are just trying to amp up the idiotic "but muh both sides" argument.
One of the candidates wants to turn America into a dictatorshop, the other one doesn't.
- It's already a fascist dictatorship, it has been. We have a dictatorship of capital where both right wing parties answer to the same bankers, CEOs, and the donor class. They are the ones directing policy, not us.
FPTP is not.
Ranked choice voting is overwhelmingly overdue here.
It would end the GOP overnight.
If one is so generous as to call the US a democracy still. It’s more like an oligarchy, if not a kleptocracy.
- Corporatocracy.
There is no democracy until we have ranked choice. Right now it's two sides having to place a god damn bet every election cycle instead of finding common ground which definitely exists.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
With less than four months to go, America’s presidential race, global democracy’s showpiece event, has boiled down to a choice between a crook, a codger, a cheerleader and a charlatan.
The word, by definition, denotes a personality characterised by impaired empathy and remorse, narcissism, superficial charm, manipulativeness, dishonesty and an outward appearance of normality.
Yet now, unbelievably, this sleazy liar, convicted felon and wannabe dictator, this serial sexual abuser, faux-Christian and closet racist reckons he holds the moral high ground.
Names like California’s Gavin Newsom, Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer and former transport secretary Pete Buttigieg are tossed around like racecourse betting tickets.
Intriguingly, the same fate could befall Trump one day, given his telling choice of the unpleasantly hard-right, white nationalist-populist senator JD Vance as running mate.
Vance’s extremist, intolerant views on abortion, immigration, isolationism and protectionism, plus his inflammatory, divisive rhetoric, typify America’s hugely self-destructive 2024 election.
The original article contains 951 words, the summary contains 143 words. Saved 85%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

7 comments