Question regarding the routing table
Question regarding the routing table
Let's say I have a Linux VM. Default route is the gateway to the top of rack switch for public internet and a public IP is bound on one virtual nic.
2nd interface is on a private network so the VM can be reached anywhere on the VPN. This is a management network where the gateway is on the other side of the data center.
A lot of stuff sits on the 10.0.0.0/8 that needs to reach this vm so a static route for the second interface points that /8 to that gateway on say 10.100.100.1
Now inside the same cabinet are devices sitting on 10.20.20.0/24.
If I didn't do anything, would hitting something on say 10.20.20.2 route traffic through gateway outside of the cab and back? I would think so as it sees the routing table and has no way of knowing.
If I want to optimize traffic so nothing is routed and traffic stays local to the cab, could I just add a third nic and give it an IP of say 10.20.20.3 and hitting .2 would arp / hit it directly through the switch in the cab?
You're viewing a single thread.
If both networks 10.100.100.0/24? And 10.20.20.0/24 share the same level 2 Ethernet segment/vlan/broadcast domain, you don't even need the third nic, you can setup a secondary IPv4 address on the private nic on the 10.20.20.0/24 network.
I would not call that best practice, but if the number of host on the network is reasonable and you are aware of the security problems created, there's nothing really wrong with this setup.
Having two nics on the same Ethernet network is actually trickier since you have to do ARP filtering.