Skip Navigation
datahoarder @lemmy.ml stricken_liftoff @feddit.ch

Thoughts on ArchiveBox for archiving webpages?

github.com GitHub - ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox: 🗃 Open source self-hosted web archiving. Takes URLs/browser history/bookmarks/Pocket/Pinboard/etc., saves HTML, JS, PDFs, media, and more...

🗃 Open source self-hosted web archiving. Takes URLs/browser history/bookmarks/Pocket/Pinboard/etc., saves HTML, JS, PDFs, media, and more... - GitHub - ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox: 🗃 Open source self-hos...

GitHub - ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox: 🗃 Open source self-hosted web archiving. Takes URLs/browser history/bookmarks/Pocket/Pinboard/etc., saves HTML, JS, PDFs, media, and more...

Has anyone used ArchiveBox for self hosted web archiving? If so, what are your thoughts on it compared to Internet Archive or other publicly available services?

8
Hacker News @lemmy.smeargle.fans bot @lemmy.smeargle.fans
BOT
ArchiveBox: Open-source self-hosted web archiving

You're viewing a single thread.

8 comments
  • It's a great tool, but depends on what you expect from it and your use case. Personally I tried it but was always disappointed by it. I always just end up using SingleFile(Z) on my browser or in the cli along with the usual yt-dlp and the like and that's all I need really. And if I need to save an entire site I just use wget or httrack. I don't really have the need for a browsable archive of my saved pages, I usually order them by subject when saving.

8 comments