Skip Navigation

David Brooks Thinks Class Has More to Do With Where You Eat Than Where You Work

jacobin.com David Brooks Thinks Class Has More to Do With Where You Eat Than Where You Work

David Brooks, elite pundit par excellence, has been giving a master lesson for years in how to talk about class without actually talking about class. But class is about material realities, not empty cultural signifiers like one’s TV habits or food preferences.

David Brooks Thinks Class Has More to Do With Where You Eat Than Where You Work
4

You're viewing a single thread.

4 comments
  • I really dislike how the wealthy have turned such a fundemental human element as food into a class thing. The great irony is that so many "peasant" dishes are highly regarded by "foodies", they generally just have to be peasant dishes from another country or percieved exotic location.

    There's nothing virtuous about a person's taste in food, it's completely subjective and based in such great degree on simply what you happened to eat growing up.

    I had friends when I was younger who were very passively judgemental about food and taste, it kind of completely turned me off to the idea of trying to have "refined taste" at all. I don't want to meet some standard of taste, I will shamelessly enjoy what I like with no apologies, whether it's some painstakingly prepared dish from a nice restaurant or boxed mac and cheese with hotdogs, because the only thing that matters in terms of enjoyment is subjective to us as an individuals.

    Anyway, sorry, just had to get that out lol. Everyone needs to stop being pretentious about food, we'll all be better off for it.