Skip Navigation

Worldwide directory - Local Anarchist Groups in your area

www.radical-guide.com A Radical Guide

A Radical Guide is a dynamic media platform that embodies our mission to celebrate and deepen our understanding of anarchist and radical movements.

A Radical Guide

For such a useful website it has a really annoying pop-up.

20

You're viewing part of a thread.

Show Context
20 comments
  • Because you got banned on the first one.

    Yeah, I have never denied that. I was banned on one instance so I branched out to different instances. I decentralized, which lines up with the entire spirit of the Fediverse.

    Getting banned, and then making a bunch of accounts on new instances saying “Despite the attempts to silence me, I’m still here” is evading the ban.

    I disagree. Evading a ban is coming up with a DIFFERENT user name, then going into places I was banned from and continuing to post. I have never posted on .world since the ban (other than to respond to the thread you participated in and I worked with .world admin on that and made them and my admin aware of it).

    By me keeping the same username across instances, I'm being transparent. It would be very easy to just pick a new name, and go back on .world and post. That would be ban evading, which I don't do.

    Me posting on another instance isn't a ban evade by any definition. Admins agree.

    I quoted mod logs of you violating the rules with incredible aggressiveness, pissing off almost everyone, and posting unhinged messages to people.

    Nope. You have pissed people off, does that make you a troll? I never posted any unhinged messages. Please quote one in this thread. I wanna see. I haven't changed what or how I post/reply at all. I stand by what I say and believe in.

    still posting ragebait like “transracial” and content from Fox News and Breitbart

    "Ragebait" is posting something to piss people off on purpose. I don't do that. I post whatever I find interesting, regardless of source, and I follow rules of the communities. And when I don't, they remove.

    I recently had a community say my source wasn't good enough and gave me a list of sources that they thought were acceptable. So now I only post from those sources.

    Not everyone hates Fox News and Brietbart. You do, and that's perfectly fine. If you modded a community, I wouldn't post from those sources. But those sources are not outlawed in the US or the earth or Lemmy. Even if you wish they were.

    I'm not sorry that I don't hate Trump as much as Lemmy does. But apparently a huge chunk of the US doesn't either, since he won popular vote.

    But I still didn't vote for him nor do I think he will be a good president. And I don't think that just because I post a news article that is favorable to him makes me a "nazi."

    A lot of your postings and the sheer magnitude of them sound sincerely unhinged,

    Please provide a sample of what you think was unhinged. I'm not being a dick, I honestly want to see what you think is unhinged. I stand by everything I said. And in fact, send people links to my previous conversations when I don't want to repeat the same thing.

    came back with a friendlier approach

    I haven't changed my tone at all, nor do/did I see a reason to.

    because that’s trolling.

    Trolling is saying things just TO piss people off, not saying things that happen to piss people off.

    But, you’re the one who chose to come in and reply to my comment, when I’d taken steps to block you,

    It's not my job to find out if someone has blocked me or not. I didn't even know you blocked me until you mentioned it at the start of this conversation by saying the variation of "in spite of my attempts to block you.."

    Not only that, I was agreeing with your comment when I replied.

    It seems to me now matter how or what I reply, you are determined to think I have some ulterior motive here. I'd really like you to just say what that is.

    Don't be vague, and say "you like to annoy people." I feel that under the surface, you actually think my MO is something specific and sinister. If you feel that would break this subs rules, feel free to DM me.

    But I am really, honestly curious what you think my goal is. People mentioned before that by me saying I supported third-party, it was to "throw the election." Tho even if every single person that voted third-party would have voted for Harris, she still would have lost since the margin was so big.

    And now plenty of people talk about voting or creating a third party. lol

    I'm very curious of what you think my motive is. Or maybe it is just that you think I'm here to annoy. Or maybe you won't answer because you've blocked me.

    To your point, this is probably off-topic for this community anyway.

    Either way, best of luck to ya, mate!

    It's just Lemmy, man... :)

20 comments