The Real Reason Republicans Are Attacking Kamala Harris as 'Childless'
The Real Reason Republicans Are Attacking Kamala Harris as 'Childless'
Republicans to control every aspect of women's lives and their bodies. That’s why Harris' life choices and political success infuriate them
You're viewing a single thread.
George Washington was sterile and, of course, had no children.
58 0 ReplyBut the sons of his opponents wished that he was their dad.
11 0 ReplyHe'll save children, but not the British children.
Added context: https://youtu.be/sbRom1Rz8OA?si=x2kIUb6LsEi8I-Ac
6 0 Reply
Is she sterile?
5 0 ReplyIf she is it's none of your, or anyone else's business
64 0 ReplyA your mama joke would fit in well here...
12 0 ReplySterile George Washington would fit well in your mama's cherry orchard.
8 0 ReplyHis teeth weren’t the only thing made of wood.
9 0 Reply
59 year old women typically don't have children so at this point, functionally.
10 0 ReplyWhy is this person being downvoted? This first reply could be read to suggest that Harris is sterile, and the user wanted to clarify if that was the case. It appears to be an honest question.
4 0 ReplyThank you. I was just asking because I didn’t know. But, ya know, internet.
3 0 Reply
One is a choice, the other in not. Fair question to ask in the thread.
3 0 ReplyNeither one is our fucking business.
7 0 ReplyThe question was comparing Harris and Washington. As they teach my kids, "Look for context clues!"
2 0 Reply