Google's AI Overviews now link to Wikipedia and LinkedIn more than Reddit, study finds
Google's AI Overviews now link to Wikipedia and LinkedIn more than Reddit, study finds
Google appears to be taking a more cautious approach with AI Overviews by prioritizing sites other than forums such as Reddit, SE Ranking found.
You're viewing a single thread.
Wonder how good Google is feeling about that 60 million dollar deal to scrape all of Reddits wisdom
76 0 ReplyReddit wisdom:
"This"
"Bacon"
"OK, boomer"
pun thread 37 levels deep
67 0 ReplyEdit: Thank you, kind stranger!
41 0 ReplyHow long before the AI answer to every question is simply "username checks out"? :-P
29 0 ReplyNarwhal
16 0 ReplyBacons
8 0 Replyat midnit omg we are all le redditors!!!
8 0 ReplyOh, me from 15 years ago. How young I was (30!)
2 0 Reply
I wonder how Reddit investors are feeling when they find out even Google couldn't pull something valuable out of the Reddit data
31 0 ReplyYet I still add "Reddit" to a search query when looking for product reviews or technical/home maintenance support, lol
I can do it really well manually...but Google's AI sucks at it.
They forgot to account for trolls...and how often trolls would get upvoted for the lulz
19 0 Replysarcasm is already hard to understand online, even harder for generative AI
I know sometimes I would take a peek at the person's comment history to see if they were well informed / a shill for the product. The AI can't do that
5 0 ReplyGenerative AI doesn't understand anything, it just adds it to it's model. If more people are being sarcastic than genuine in the data set, that'll be more represented in the generated text.
AI could categorize users by competency (i.e. how often they discuss specific topics and agree with some corpus), but I doubt it does that. It's probably just taking posts at face value.
7 0 ReplyDoing that would require significantly more compute power, so there’s little economic incentive.
3 0 ReplyAI could categorize users by competency (i.e. how often they discuss specific topics and agree with some corpus), but I doubt it does that. It’s probably just taking posts at face value.
This is not being done though right? I haven't heard anything about content ranking with connections outside of Google seemingly using authors name is articles from large news sources.
1 0 Reply
We need to stop calling it AI. It's LLM and there is no intelligence.
3 0 ReplyI know it's not "intelligent", but I don't get gatekeeping the phrase "AI".
We were perfectly happy to use "AI" to refer to the logic of computer-controlled enemies in video games for probably decades.
1 0 Reply
I'd imagine 60 million dollars to google is like 60 cents to most of us.
16 0 ReplyUnfortunately it's pocket change for them.
Meaningless wager that despite not paying off still probably taught them an enormous amount about reddit and its users.
5 0 ReplyI would have taught Google everything they wanted to know about Reddit and Redditors for only $30 million.
6 0 Reply