What if the length of a term was proportional to the amount you won by in the election?
What if the length of a term was proportional to the amount you won by in the election?
Seems odd that if you win by 0.001% that's treated the same as if you win by 50%. "You barely won, here's the same mandate as someone who won soundly"
Probably a bad idea, but there's an idea in there that isn't dumb.
You're viewing a single thread.
All comments
24
comments
would you want Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho in office for that long?
6 0 ReplyCompared to a lot of what I've been seeing, Camacho isn't looking half bad right now.
2 0 Replyat this point, I've resigned myself to the fact that Idiocracy has become canon.
1 0 Reply2036 Presidential Election: You voting for Amazon or Meta?
1 0 Reply
24
comments
Scroll to top