Redditors Vent and Complain When People Mock Their "AI Art"
Redditors Vent and Complain When People Mock Their "AI Art"
An upset Reddit user said they shared several AI art images in a Facebook group and then got banned for posting AI art.
Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists' permission. And that's without getting into AI's negative drag on the environment.
You're viewing a single thread.
AI doesn't exist, it's all machine learning or LLMs.
They're just self-glorified public domain contributors.
There is no AI art
Despite what people with no knowledge of the field will tell you, Machine Learning and LLMs fall under the category of AI. What you're looking for is a very specific type of AI. If AI art doesn't exist, it would be because the art usually doesn't have meaning or effort, not because AI doesn't exist.
Intelligence is the misnomer. It's like calling airplanes 'artificial birds' (credit Don Norman).
Humans create art, AI generates images based on other's art.AI art is a contradiction in its own wording.There is no AI art, just large collections of public domain images labeled as "AI art"I misread, just woke up.
The field of AI would never develop if everything they made along the way had to be thrown away as "not real AI".
At one point, getting computers to understand the rules of chess at all was part of the AI field. So was Conway's Game of Life, which uses a few simple rules to simulate cellular organisms and create some fascinating patterns. Optimizing compilers and virtual machines also came out of AI research.
The "not real AI" meme has no basis in the history of the field.
General AI doesn't exist. Intelligent systems and agents very much do exist.