This is a friendly place. Please don't brim-shame
This is a friendly place. Please don't brim-shame
![the background blur](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a9634f99-560e-449b-83a5-49d632c3228e.jpeg?thumbnail=256&format=webp)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/a9634f99-560e-449b-83a5-49d632c3228e.jpeg?thumbnail=1024&format=webp)
via Shen Comix - https://nitter.d420.de/shenanigansen
You're viewing a single thread.
It’s also true for witches!
5 0 ReplyWe need a gender-neutral term
2 0 ReplyIn a lot of fantasy the terms are already neutral and only denote magical specialty. Witch - magic user, with a familiar, specialized in potions Warlock - magic user, specialized in the demonic Wizard - magic user focused on pure magic
10 0 ReplyAnd Sorcerors dedicated to coming up with new Magic. Hence the Source-ror thing.
... yes this joke is stolen. Yes. From there.
2 0 Reply
I feel like we've dropped gender for wizards in D&D. I've seen a few homebrew witch classes that are gender inclusive.
5 0 ReplyThat's how I've been playing it for years. Witches are folk hedges, barely closer to wizard than druid.
4 0 Reply
Witchards?
1 0 ReplyWitchtards if you will
1 0 Reply