Skip Navigation

Why don't more people use desktop Linux? I have a theory you might not like

www.zdnet.com Why don't more people use desktop Linux? I have a theory you might not like

There might be a very simple explanation for why the masses have yet to adopt Linux as their desktop operating system and it's one the open-source community won't like.

Why don't more people use desktop Linux? I have a theory you might not like

I'm curious to hear thoughts on this. I agree for the most part, I just wish people would see the benefit of choice and be brave enough to try it out.

136

You're viewing a single thread.

136 comments
  • I think the reason is that 1. Linux is still too hard for the average person and 2. The average person just doesn't care

    Yes, you don't have to write bash scripts or compile the kernel yourself, but still, Linux is different in many ways from Windows. This is on top of the fact that most people don't know much about tech in general and often have problems with (imo) very basic stuff. I honestly can't imagine them downloading an ISO file, flashing it onto an USB stick and then booting from it. Most people probably don't even know that Windows != PC

    Then there's also the fact that the average person just doesn't care. They just want to get things done

    (sidenote: I might sound elitist but I'm not. I don't think it's reasonable to expect everyone to be interested in tech, just like it's not reasonable to, for example, expect everyone to be interested in cars. It just so happens that the tech industry is tightly connected to freedom, privacy, etc. while the car industry is not)

136 comments