You're viewing a single thread.
167
comments
It says you're bound by "opening and using" the product, rather than "opening or using". Have someone else open it for you. Then neither of you have done both.
Thus is the kind of legalistic bullshit interpretation I can get right behind
Contractual malicious compliance let's go
I think it should be “and/or” because if it’s just “or” the terms would only apply if you either open it or use it.
No, that's xor
Go one step further and have someone under 18 who cannot legally enter into a contract open it haha
I think having someone open if for you still counts. You'd have to already find one opened.
Leave it in a workplace fridge with a clear sticker saying "MIKES DO NOT TOUCH"
167
comments