Guy explains to CEO of Signal (messaging) that it's going to add "AI" to the service. She says no. He insists, not knowing or caring who he's talking down to.
Guy explains to CEO of Signal (messaging) that it's going to add "AI" to the service. She says no. He insists, not knowing or caring who he's talking down to.
Attached: 1 image Seen on Bluesky: Guy explains to CEO of Signal (messaging) that it's going to add "AI" to the service. She says no. He insists, not knowing or caring who he's talking down to.
human-driven technology goes brrrrr
You're viewing a single thread.
To be fair, as soon as Signal chooses do to so, they can walk back any statement. Her words don't hold much value either...
I guess people forgot how Mozilla not that long ago simply went ahead and deleted mentions of 'never selling your data'
Lemmy users will really do anything before they believe a woman, won't they?
"The man is still correct because the Signal CEO may claim that TODAY that engineers are not currently working on adding AI, but that doesn't mean in the future she won't say it was worked on in the past!"
Lemmy users will really do anything before they believe a woman, won't they?
What a weird take on this.
💅
Are you a feminist by chance? Just asking cuz I know a feminist who uses this particular emoji a lot haha.
yes