Millennials are abandoning organized religion. A new study provides insight into why
Millennials are abandoning organized religion. A new study provides insight into why
A new study finds that many young Americans are walking away from organized religion—not because they’ve lost belief, but because their values around authenticity, justice, and individual autonomy conflict with the teachings and politics of religious institutions.
Over the past few decades, the number of Americans who identify as religiously unaffiliated—often referred to as “nones”—has grown rapidly. In the 1970s, only about 5% of Americans fell into this category. Today, that number exceeds 25%. Scholars have debated whether this change simply reflects a general decline in belief, or whether it signals something more complex. The research team wanted to explore the deeper forces at play: Why are people leaving institutional religion? What are they replacing it with? And how are their personal values shaping that process?
You're viewing a single thread.
Everyone, myself included always come back to the same reason - there is no proof.
If I was given actual proof of a god or pantheon or any other ridiculous nonsense I’d absolutely change my mind but actual proof magic exists can’t exist because magic isn’t real
I fully accept that I don’t and can’t truly understand the universe but where the fuck does that somehow morph into “god did it” it’s ok not to know everything I don’t need made up bullshit to fill the gaps so I can feel better about not having every answer. Live with not knowing, that’s what being human is meant to be, acceptance
god definitely exists, as it's just a philosophical concept to say the "cause of all causes". by definition, such a thing exists, i would say.
the issue is more with organized religion. there's a lot of rules and bureaucracy in it, and most of that is outdated.
god definitely exists, as it's just a philosophical concept to say the "cause of all causes".
I hope you stretched before making that leap.
Snark aside, this is just a dressed-up version of the "god of the gaps" argument, and is by no means proof of the existence of god. Changing the definition of "god" to be the "cause of all causes" is uselessly broad at best, and misattribution at worst - the "cause of all causes" may very well be a natural phenomenon, at which point attributing it to "god" is just straight up incorrect.
by definition, such a thing exists, i would say.
Actually, maybe not. There's some new theories and evidence suggesting that it's possible that the universe is eternal, as in it has always existed, making the existence of a "cause of all causes" impossible (unless of course you also water down the definition of that phrase to the point where it's meaningless).
god definitely exists, as it’s just a philosophical concept to say the “cause of all causes”.
Most believers will assert that their god exists in a different, more concrete way. The number of persons able or willing to discuss the topic on your terms is an insignificant minority.