You're viewing a single thread.
As an artist, all y'all need to chill. The problem is capitalism, and it's not like artists make a living anyway. Democratizing art opens up a lot of possibilities, you technophobes.
End capitalism, then. I'm waiting.
Easy. Don't work a job or pay rent. Anarchism already exists. It just exists in the crannies (like right in front of you) where other domineering primates don't beat you with sticks or boss you around. You don't fix the system. You ignore it.
You don't fix the system. You ignore it.
I'll tell that to the IRS the next time I refuse to pay taxes.
You're not an artist if you think AI is OK.
You have no comprehension of relevance.
No I'm pretty sure I do.
On the surface. But, you're being rhetorical, in the original sense of the word. You can link words together but fail to do logic. You're doing duckspeak, quack quack
think more. if i draw something that looks nice on paper, and at the same time am fine with asking chatgpt to solve a math problem, why would my views on ai affect me being an artist or not?
Because ChatGPT is trained on stolen data and using it for any reason is participating in that theft while simultaneously causing a significant impact to the environment.
So I guess your right; it has no bearing on whether you're an artist or not, but whether you're a decent person. Thanks for clearing that up.
Now what if you used an ai trained on uncopyrighted, public data, and made sure that the computers training it were using solar power or some environmentally friendly energy source?
Let me know when this happens then I'll answer.
But you see my point, right? There is a point at which this stuff isn't actually that bad.
It has the potential to be useful, yes. It isn't currently and the path we're on with it is already irredeemable.