You compared pitbulls with Cockers and I'm unable to reason. Right
As if UN and its agencies were neutral
Of course it solves, for the people and other dogs who would get bitten by them
Because the collapse of Libya and Syria worked really well
Here comes another Libya and Syria
Your are just ignoring the fact that pitbulls are just more efficient in killing than any other race. Even if they got replaced, it would result in less deaths because not a single breed compares to them in terms of killing.
So yes, pitbulls are assault rifles, German Shepards are 38 revolvers and your friends Cocker are butter knifes. Changing one to another is safer to everyone
Tell me when a cocker reach this kind of mortality then I will tell you to ban them too
Don't create excuses. Not all dogs are the same, this dog is a murder machine and should be put down. It's not their fault, but this doesn't change the fact that they were bred to maximum damage
My thoughts are just based in numbers, yours, not so much
Except this breed was created by us specifically for its violence. It's in their genes. As far as I know there was no artificial breeding for pure violent humans. We created this abomination, we should put and end to it
If this is the one I've heard before, it's 500km away from the river mouth
Maybe it existed before for other models and just those Japanese ones didn't have the exploit yet
No, the second best was 10 years minus 1 day ago
The problem everybody complains is not tourism but mass tourism, I completely understand it, but it's up to the locals to fix the over demand
The communities on lemm.ee will vanish. You will be able to see its history because federated posts are kept locally on each instance, but you will not be able to create new posts for example.
You should migrate it to somewhere else and inform the users(make a fixed post on your ocmmunity)
Cute, but should be put down as all others of this race
But what about Word, Excel, Project, OneDrive and so on? Most companies will pay for 365 and think, if I get Teams on it, why pay for another tool?
Unless you completely ditch 365 and that's where you get to the scenario I mentioned before
Honestly it's very hard to compete with 365 today, specially now in cloud days. They offer so much with so much integration and if you want to replace it then you have to use a bunch of different software that don't "talk to themselves"
They themselves abandoned their cloud data centers(SAP Neo Environment) in favor of using American ones. So if you want to install a brand new SAP software you are forced to use Google, AWS or Azure
As you said. This CO2 is "harmless". For the atmosphere it does not add any more co2 than it existed, since you are releasing the one was captured by the crop.
So it does not create more greenhouse gas emissions.
That's what you meant on your first post. You don't care about local emissions, but global overall emissions of CO2, sorry.
There is a ICE fuel that does not produce co2, at least considering the whole fuel cycle, it's called biofuel and it's already used by half a century in some places like Brazil