Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RM
Posts
2
Comments
520
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Depends on what issue you have, I get intense headaches/nausea/dizziness from looking at digital screens without my glasses for more than 20 seconds or so. The longer I look at them the worse it gets and longer it lasts. So it's not really viable.

  • They'll absolutely be possible, it's crazy easy to make addons that edit webpages.

    What will be really nice is if someone goes to the effort to make some sort of all in one AI blocker similar to an ad blocker, that removes AI summaries from all sources that have it, so we don't need a specific add on for each site.

  • If you have it search the internet yes, that's competely different to its default behaviour though. That's specifically providing it a document to look at after it has been trained, which it can look at and refer to.

  • Because it's complicated. It is fed that data, but it can't access it, refer to it, look it up or anything like that. If you feed it all of reddit, you can't just ask it what comments did this user make, it simply doesn't know. It uses all the data it's fed to build statistical patterns of language and concepts, which is what it then outputs.

    This is why it can quote things like Shakespeare, because that information is so widely repeated, it's fed it so many times, it's a common pattern it can reliably reproduce. But it isn't looking in some database and finding that Shakespeare quote to repeat, it doesn't have that ability or information.

  • Tbh if they game get them to ask it about that, it fails spectacularly badly, even worse than in general. TV shows and movies it's a bit better on, probably because there are so many episode summaries and reviews online, but if you talk to it long enough and ask varied and specific enough information it'll fail there too.

    They may not be an expert at something, but if they have a specific interest or hobby that'll probably work.

  • I agree with everything you said. And I get the tone at the end. There are certainly things I believe that are wrong. But while I obviously still have biases, I also have a crippling fear of telling someone something wrong. So generally I at the least won't say something to someone else unless I've triple confirmed it's correct.

    Which is also how I know I believe things that are wrong, because I've looked into something before telling it to people and found it was wrong. I don't intentionally believe wrong things. But based on that I know there must still be some.

  • Tbh I get it from a certain point of view. We all made fun of bitcoin at first but now it's pretty common for people to wish they could tell their younger self to get as much as they can afford.

    I get the idea of not wanting to miss out on the next thing that did that.

  • And lettuce is 96% water. Basically every fruit and vegetable is more water than a human is. But you hand me a bowl of lettuce and call it soup we're gonna have words.

    Also humans are more like 60%.

  • It's so we don't have to spam brackets everywhere

    9+2-1+6-4+7-3+5=

    Becomes

    ((((((9+2)-1)+6)-4)+7)-3)+5=

    That's just clutter for no good reason when we can just say if it doesn't have parentheses it's left to right. Having a default evaluation order makes sense and means we only need parentheses when we want to deviate from the norm.