Wenn man alle potentiell relevanten Gene einsetzt müsste man eigentlich mit einigen Generationen normalerer Züchtung eine sinvolle expremierung anzüchten können.Gibt endlose regulationsmechanismen, also sollte das hoch und runterregulieren recht schnell gehen. Ich meine ein paar der Mechanismen wären sogar "epigenetisch" (methylierungen etc.).
Disclaimer: Ist Jahre her dass ich mit bioengineering und Biochemie zu tun hatte.
Es gibt bei Planzen grob 2 verschiedene Formen von Photosynthese Zyklen, bei denen am Ende Zucker rauskommt: C3 und C4
Simplifiziert läuft die hintere Kette der Umwandlung bei C3 sofort, und bei C4 in der "Downtime" also Nachts.C4 hat hier den klaren Vorteil, dass die hinteren Teile der Kette keine Bedingungen an den Wasserhaushalt der Planze setzen, wärend diese von der Sonne bestrahlt wird. Grob arbeitet die Planze damit mit viel weniger Verdunstung, also ist viel sparsamer mit Wasser.
Mais ist C4, Weizen C3, desshalb baut z.B. der eher Aride Teil der USA so extrem viel Mais an (was dann deren ganze Ernärung fickt weil die überall Fruktosesirup reinballern müssen).Weizen wächst dagegen in den selteneren Regionen wo viel Wasser zur Verfügung steht. Da kommt dann krams raus wie die Ukraine die quasi ganz Europas Weizen in einem kleinen Gebiet anbaut, weil da halt gute Bedingungen sind.
Also, was ist wenn ich in Weizen die komplette C4 Photosynthese Kette transplantiere?
... Zumindest viel mehr Weizen und weniger Mais, also ein fettest Plus für die Gesundheit von Grundnahrungsmitteln.Und weniger Wasserknappheit dort wo Weizen angebaut wird.
Ist eigentlich ne ähnliche Situation wie Fleisch, wo man auch einfach ne komplett andere Planze nehmen könnte die schon C4 ist, aber das halt defakto nie tun wird.Wenn ich statt Vollkornbrot nur noch Maiswaffeln fressen muss, geht ich besser den ganzen Schritt und entferne mich komplett permanent aus der Klimabillanz.
Anyway, ist vielleicht nicht das beste Beispiel, aber C4 Weizen schlägt auch Mais in Wassereffizienz weil das Zeug halt neben C4 noch eine etwas effizientere Planze ist. Und damit ist das schonmal was ertragreicheres als man vorher in ariden Regionen anbauen konnte.Ist jetzt kein Kaktus, aber gibt halt ewig große Gebiete wo im Moment nur Gras für Vie angebaut wird, oder extrem hartnäckige aber wenig gezüchtete Getreide mit geringem Ertrag.
I'll take best guesses. It's hard to answer, you can always pile in more data.
Ideally one could collect some candidate ideas, like "random point inland of antarctica", "random point within a few thousand km of point nemo", ... then maybe do some estimates of how many people have crossed those areas, and how randomly, and then estimate the expected largest gap with that amount of paths and that area statistically.
For example with 2 thousand flights straight through the south pole from random directions, over the disk 500km in radius from the south pole, I would expect very loosely a gap of 10km to randomly be left somewhere on the border of that disk, so there would be a point 500km from the south pole, that noone has been within 10km of ever.
By population, most humans lived after the bronze age collapse, and like 20%+ after the industrial revolution. We estimate only a bit over 100 billion humans in total.
So really I think you can ignore anything pre-industrial without too much loss. Anything preindustrial humans got to, nowadays many more can get to, so those areas would be densely covered.
But really since a single person can ruin a point, you also need to consider all weird stuff.
Point Nemo, people could have gotten to more frequently since maybe 500 years ago with better ships. To consider would be roughly were sail ships would sail, snd where they could end up with any number of accidents. Then the same for steam ships, and modern container ships.Weirdnesses would be survey ships for example. Anyone mapping the ocean floor, or looking for resources to mine, will very strategically cover an entire area with lines maybe 10-20km appart. The same happens with survey planes.
And who knows where a nuclesr sub might cross the pacific between various start and end-points.
Finally there is the worst nightmare, explorers.Your guess for the point: remote hard to get to location.Consequence: Point becomes famous, 50 people will risk their life to ship themselves to the south pole, the tallest mountain in antarctica, or point nemo.So anything that has a name and is known to be remote is probably out.
I doubt there's any island larger than a rock that noone has landed on. (For some time people even specifically sought out islands that don't even have vegetation, to mine nitrogen). Anything larger than a km surely someone would have explored more. So points on those islands would at most be some hundreds of meters.
Given how few islands and how much ocean there is, any island is much more interesting and thus more likely to have had someone visit than some comparable location in the ocean without an island.
Surely because it is famous, some people have travelled there. So of it was the point originally, it would then have moved away and is now at a balance, not too far away that the area is more frequented, but not too close so it just happens to not be near any of the paths people took to get to point nemo or back.
The point noone has ever been near to. For the greatest possible definition of near where there still is such a point.
For example, say humans have been within 10km of every point of earth, except one random location 500km from the south pole, where even by plane noone has been closer than 10.001km when viewed top-down, so on a map.
Can't be that simple. There have been multiple teams now, if they came from say 4 orthogonal directions that would already push this point out multiple hundred km. Even if they all took the same route, there is now the "Amundsen-Scott Station" there, directly on the south pole, with regular flights. Even tourist flights.
Surely those flights have taken various routes to the station and covered antarctica in a fairly dense mesh of lines of longitude.
Edit:Rough numbers: according to wikipedia "Between October and February, there are several flights per week of U.S. Air Force [...]". So let's call that 50 flights a year for 40 years, 2000 flights.Now, if those had all flown fanned out, which realistically ofc they wouldn't have, that would put them only 3km apart even at the coastline 1000km from the south pole.
Also a different note, surely there must have been various surveys flown all across antarctica.
Maybe. It's been a while so I don't know 100% this was put to the test, but I wanna say the system has a weird kernel which leads to it not swapping out tmpfs properly.
But ordinarily you should be right, this would simply ruin the stats visually until something forced it to swap out, since konsole shouldn't be accessing it.
There was a dedicated person on call, but it happened to be when they were away.The Konsole was left running from a local access, with a while true loop of a service status command. When that service was stopped later, the while loop started rerunning the script every second, filling the buffer with error messages.The tab was then killed remotely, but the Konsole window left running. Process ram usage went down but the file remained on tmpfs, which is not counted as ram usage so wasn't noticed.Then it took some time to notice the ram usage mismatch so noone thought of that konsole incident.
I could have, but the system wasn't set up to restart without downtime, and the server was also remote and not easily accessible.It did acutally die due to a poweroutage some months later and took 2 days to get restarted.So yeah sometimes restarting is way more undesirable than loosing access to 32GB of ram. I would have just eaten that cost otherwise until a more opportune chance to restart.
Besides, restarting to fix a problem is equivalent to giving up on understanding the issue, learning new stuff, and maybe finding a way better solution or preventing the type of error entirely.I get not finding the motivation when your software is working against you and learning is ultimately fruitless like on windows, or not having the time in the moment to figure it out properly, but a perfectly good bug on a linux system when you have time is prime real-estate to grow your skills and find fulfillment.
Nothing new can open it immediately.So it's effectively deleted with old references slowly phasing out.
Zombie files are an issue though. A while back I had a huge zombie file on a tmpfs which was filling all my ram. So I built a tool to track it down and traced it to a konsole instance with a killed tab that previously had billions of lines of stdout history.
If they can claim this, then the music should already be in youtubes system and recognized on the video, in which case it is attributed under the description.
Ganz klar ein Referendum ob man zuerst mit Zwangssterilisationen anfängt, mit Zwangsabtreibungen, oder ob nicht-genemigte Kinder als Arbeitskräfte nach Qatar verkauft werden.
Wenn man alle potentiell relevanten Gene einsetzt müsste man eigentlich mit einigen Generationen normalerer Züchtung eine sinvolle expremierung anzüchten können.Gibt endlose regulationsmechanismen, also sollte das hoch und runterregulieren recht schnell gehen. Ich meine ein paar der Mechanismen wären sogar "epigenetisch" (methylierungen etc.).