My Ghz brings all the boys to the yard...

"Home thinking kills the AI industry."

"You wouldn't imagine a pair of juicy titties."

Watts ≠ watt hours

It is quite upsetting. I agree.

Not to be pedantic or pro ai, but what about the people who cannot visualize in their heads? It's a real condition.

I damn, I never thought of that... You know what, I am just going to sit here and think about tits for the next ten minutes just for my bros who can't.
- We appreciate your dedication. Sounds like fun.
- pour out a tit-daydream for those that can’t
That's what rule34 is for.
- Fair and true.
Aphantasia would be the name. I mostly never have images that I can see in my mind, sometimes I get quick flashes, but that's about it really. I didn't realize for the longest time that not everyone is like me and that only about 1-4% of people have aphantasia.
- A co-worker of mine also claimed to have that but I really can't understand how that works or how you could think at all without images. He couldn't explain it to me either, maybe you can.
  How to you e.g. remember a route to a certain location in your city? What happens in your head if we played a pen and paper roleplaying game? What happens when you hear an audiobook or read a book? How do you dream? What if I ask you what your best friend looks like, how can you describe him without an image?
I'll do it for them for free. You're welcome, animaniacs or whatever they're called
Fair.
The same thing they did pre ai.
Pencil and paper 📝

Watts are power not energy. It can be done with 12W it will just take longer.

The unit is correct. You can think about tits for as long as you want, and the human brain uses less power while doing so. Here's some improved wording:
The human brain uses 12W while it thinks about tities whereas AI doing the same thing uses 2.7 GW.
The major change was from "to" to "while", and I would argue that those words can actually mean the same thing:
"A person uses 100W to ride a bicycle" means the same thing as "A person uses 100 watts while riding a bicycle.
So, I would conclude that the meme is fine.
- No. 2.7GW is not possible for that. For reference the whole of France is 150GW

so my brain is a machine that turns calories into mental images of hella fat tiddies but not a GODDAMN DROP OF SERATONIN

If huge bombin' gnorks don't wring a drop of serotonin outta ya, then your soul has the problem, not the boob machine.
- Huge Bombin' Gnorks would make a great band name.
- guess gay men have no soul now
And I don't think AI will help you with that either.
- alas 😔

I mean fuck AI but that's clearly a made up number. The amount of energy used during training maybe? But not running a model.

Not energy, watts are power. Doesn't make any sense

And so much faster than AI too. As soon as I finished reading the word "tits", there they were, motorboating my mind's eye.

Have You Know?

It's AI generated.
- Had no doubt. Just funny in a “This kills the crab” kind of way.

True

Giggity-Watts

So a quick google says it uses 70 millivolts.

Which means the human brain has a metric fuckton of amperage (probably explains the heat)

285 Amps.

To safely carry that current you need 95mm2 of copper wire.

9.5cm X 9.5cm

So cubed, because 2d doesn't make sense is approximately 1000cm3

The human brain is 1300cm3

That means the human brain is just one fat copper wire

It's a shame we can't up the voltage a little bit and save on brain size

I mean you can. Most states have outlawed it now and it doesn't improve performance much.
it is wrong, kinda. It would be correct if brains worked like a electrical conductor, but we are more like batteries (so ions move under electrochemical potential). in short, W = V I does not apply here.
If it did, the amount of heat produced would be humongous.
here is a reddit thread I found about this - https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/5ijvvd/what_is_the_amperage_of_the_human_nervous_system/

I get its a meme, but like, an AI would absolutely not use that much power to imagine some fat perky tits. Honestly they probably make up so much of the training data that it'd be the easiest thing for an AI to "imagine"

I know.
Enjoy the meme and don't overthink it
you can check out some training databases on hugging face, and there is 100s of gibs of porn there. it is one of the best ways to understand human antomy for image/video gen
- So those people asking source links for science were actually real?

"Have you know?" sounds like something a drunk AI would write

I just did it

You perv.

Bro... just don't gove big tech company idea, you want them to stealing brain from grave ?

I'd like to see them try after I get cremated

Out of curiosity, how many watts did my brain just consume contemplating the nose, flavor profile, mouth feel, food pairing selection, and post-dining cordial choices of said titties?

You can’t consume watts. Perhaps you meant Joules or Watt-hours?
- This is such a silly technical argument that I've seen twice now in this thread. Watts is just Joules/second. It's entirely valid to wonder "what rate am I 'consuming' energy when I do X" rather than ask "how much energy did I 'consume' when I do X"
  Making this correction is similar to telling someone that asking how fast they moved is wrong, and they should only ask how far they moved.

The greatest graphics card: imagination.

but computers can calculate a 9857408293304297*3729892093829/3809389312893382 in less than 10 ms using microwatts of energy, and humans would need a solid hours (at best minutes i presume)

Okay, but now let's add AI to the calculator so it can guess instead of calculate it and we can increase the power draw thousand-fold.